• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Forest Not Happy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 26
  • Views Views: Views 2,890
Ever since they've employed Clattenburg on their staff, they've had some odd decisions.
Still, fck em.
 
Trying to influence future referees. Deduct 10 more points from the scabs.
 
Fine incoming

New social media manager incoming
 
I agree with the general consensus that refs should not be called out for bias or cheating.

But at the same time there has to be more done for this repeated incompetence. Absolutely no surprises to see who was involved yet again and the worst they ever receive is one week off work/down a ladder rung.

How some of them are still employed is incredible.
 
The simple answer for VAR is to have specialist VAR technicians, having referees (many of which are old and don't learn technology well) do it is a terrible idea anyway
 
The simple answer for VAR is to have specialist VAR technicians, having referees (many of which are old and don't learn technology well) do it is a terrible idea
Don't like or dislike Forest but can't help thinking if those penalty appeals had been for Liverpool or Man Utd at Anfield or Old Trafford then i think at least 2 would have been given.
 
I reckon young Neco Williams has landed himself with an FA charge as well following his interview after the game.
 
Clattenburg is happy and open claiming he's a QPR fan. Yet he reffed a game involving them years ago, if he's stipulating that having a Luton fan in the var box was wrong and should have removed himself to avoid any compromise....then he's a contradictive tw@t.
 
Having now seen the 3 incidents. I can sort of see how the first two weren't overturned and similarly if they had been given the wouldn't have been overturned.
However the 3rd one was a stonewall. How that was not referred beggars belief.
 
Don't like or dislike Forest but can't help thinking if those penalty appeals had been for Liverpool or Man Utd at Anfield or Old Trafford then i think at least 2 would have been given.
I would tend to agree, although it is ironic that the big club (Man United) had a far softer penalty decision go against them yesterday. No one (except United fans) cares because we all wanted Coventry to win, but it was extremely harsh on the defender and far less of a handball than the one Forest didn't get.
 
Fuck Forest. They were bummed, all three were pens. Fuck ‘em.
That's not the point it could be us in another game.

On another VAR decision just how the fuck could they adjudge that Coventry player was offside, it was just far to close, yet Jota's goal at a game at Craven Cottage was given, there was no difference and anyway in those situations the goals should stand with the attacking side given the benefit of the doubt, we all want to see more goals.
 

Birmingham City 🏈 v Swansea City 🦢

Back
Top