Individuals with a cervix

[Darran]

Not women but Individuals with a cervix. Please fuck off.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/07/30/health/new-cervical-cancer-screening-recommendations-wellness/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

 

[BrynCartwright]

Not women but Individuals with a cervix. Please fuck off.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/07/30/health/new-cervical-cancer-screening-recommendations-wellness/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

Yep, it's PC and right-on, but covers all the bases. Just looked it up and it is estimated there are 200,000 to 500,000 trans people in the UK alone. Say 40% of those are women that identify as men, that is still a pretty big number of people.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/721642/GEO-LGBT-factsheet.pdf

 

[Darran]

They’re women Bryn whether they’ve got garage doors or not.

 

[Cooperman]

They’re women Bryn whether they’ve got garage doors or not.

Does Bryan’s garage door(s) open from the side? That’s really posh if they do.

 

[BrynCartwright]

They’re women Bryn whether they’ve got garage doors or not.

Does Bryan’s garage door(s) open from the side? That’s really posh if they do.

Who's Bryan?

 

[BanosSwan]

Does Bryan’s garage door(s) open from the side? That’s really posh if they do.

Who's Bryan?

Andrew Colwill's business partner.

 

[Cooperman]

Does Bryan’s garage door(s) open from the side? That’s really posh if they do.

Who's Bryan?

Your rival in the garage door stakes.

 

[BrynCartwright]

They’re women Bryn whether they’ve got garage doors or not.

...and Hey Presto...with a press of my special button my doors fly open!

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.

 

[Darran]

Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.

Fuck me you’re pissed early.

 

[Sa2 jack]

Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.

Are you saying that not all women have a cervix by which they are able to reproduce?

One for the professor then.

 

[J_B]

Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.

Are you saying that not all women have a cervix by which they are able to reproduce?

One for the professor then.

My wife had hers removed when she had a hysterectomy at 35.

 

[Londonlisa2001]

Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.

Are you saying that not all women have a cervix by which they are able to reproduce?

One for the professor then.

Many women have had a hysterectomy - currently about 8000 a year in the UK. It used to be performed far more frequently - around 25,000 a year. Surely you’ve heard if it? There are hundreds of thousands of women in the UK who have had the procedure. Many have the cervix removed as part of the procedure.

 

[Sa2 jack]

Lisa.We seem to have gone off at a tangent.
I was refering to females as of birth not because of surgical procedures.

Trust me,I am well aware of the cervix and especially cancer of the cervix.

Enough from me on this ,thanks

 

[Londonlisa2001]

Lisa.We seem to have gone off at a tangent.
I was refering to females as of birth not because of surgical procedures.

Trust me,I am well aware of the cervix and especially cancer of the cervix.

Enough from me on this ,thanks

Women who’ve had their cervix removed as part of a hysterectomy don’t need screening for cervical cancer. Hence ‘individuals with a cervix’ rather than women in the article. In the US (the article is American) there are about 20m women who’ve had a hysterectomy. Some are looking for outrage for the sake of it.