• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Individuals with a cervix

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 20
  • Views Views: Views 5,369
Darran

Darran

Roger Freestone
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
17,726
Reaction score
1,544
Location
A garage in Canoga Park
Not women but Individuals with a cervix. Please fuck off.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/07/30/health/new-cervical-cancer-screening-recommendations-wellness/index.html?__twitter_impression=true
 
Darran said:
Not women but Individuals with a cervix. Please fuck off.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/07/30/health/new-cervical-cancer-screening-recommendations-wellness/index.html?__twitter_impression=true
Click to expand...

Yep, it's PC and right-on, but covers all the bases. Just looked it up and it is estimated there are 200,000 to 500,000 trans people in the UK alone. Say 40% of those are women that identify as men, that is still a pretty big number of people.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/721642/GEO-LGBT-factsheet.pdf
 
Darran said:
They’re women Bryn whether they’ve got garage doors or not. 😉
Click to expand...

Does Bryan’s garage door(s) open from the side? That’s really posh if they do.
 
Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.
 
exiledclaseboy said:
Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that not all women have a cervix by which they are able to reproduce?

One for the professor then.
 
Sa2 jack said:
exiledclaseboy said:
Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that not all women have a cervix by which they are able to reproduce?

One for the professor then.
Click to expand...

My wife had hers removed when she had a hysterectomy at 35.
 
Sa2 jack said:
exiledclaseboy said:
Some women don’t have a cervix and so won’t need testing. Sometimes we read too I have into stuff in our effort be outraged at something.
Click to expand...

Are you saying that not all women have a cervix by which they are able to reproduce?

One for the professor then.
Click to expand...

Many women have had a hysterectomy - currently about 8000 a year in the UK. It used to be performed far more frequently - around 25,000 a year. Surely you’ve heard if it? There are hundreds of thousands of women in the UK who have had the procedure. Many have the cervix removed as part of the procedure.
 
Lisa.We seem to have gone off at a tangent.
I was refering to females as of birth not because of surgical procedures.

Trust me,I am well aware of the cervix and especially cancer of the cervix.

Enough from me on this ,thanks
 
Sa2 jack said:
Lisa.We seem to have gone off at a tangent.
I was refering to females as of birth not because of surgical procedures.

Trust me,I am well aware of the cervix and especially cancer of the cervix.

Enough from me on this ,thanks
Click to expand...

Women who’ve had their cervix removed as part of a hysterectomy don’t need screening for cervical cancer. Hence ‘individuals with a cervix’ rather than women in the article. In the US (the article is American) there are about 20m women who’ve had a hysterectomy. Some are looking for outrage for the sake of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 35 more.
Total: 660 (members: 85, guests: 575)
Most visitors online was 4328 , on 11 Aug 25

Birmingham City 🏈 v Swansea City 🦢

Share this page

Back
Top