• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Lucy Letby

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 65
  • Views Views: Views 7,424
legoman said:
It would be convenient for the NHS if Letby were the scapegoat to cover their own systemic failures.
Click to expand...
That would not surprise me in the slightest. I'm not saying she is innocent but this information is going to clusterfuck the original case.
 
The trouble with this new evidence? Is Dr Shoo Lee was across the ocean away in Canada, when these murders happened, whilst others who gave evidence? Well some of them were actually in the very hospital where the murders happened.

Letby’s campaigners often like to falsely portray the prosecution case as being based upon flawed analysis/findings/judgment coming from just one witness i.e. the retired paediatrician Dr Dewi Evans.

HOWEVER his analysis/opinion/evidence was peer-reviewed and signed off by the late Dr Martin Ward Platt, whom is justifiably described as an “eminent neonatologist”.

The case was examined in court using such notable/expert witnesses as neonatologist Dr Sandie Bohin...forensic pathologist Dr Andreas Marnerides...paediatric radiologist Professor Owen Arthurs...paediatric haematologist Professor Sally Kinsey...paediatric endocrinologist Professor Peter Hindmarsh...paediatric surgeon Dr Simon Kenney...and paediatric neuroradiologist Professor Stavros Stivaros, as well as other medical experts and numerous doctors at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

The CCRC will have full access and be privy to Crown Court trial transcripts, that cannot be tainted, cannot be rewritten to become 'make believe' whilst someone is looking the other way.
 
Wing_Stand_Wood said:
The trouble with this new evidence? Is Dr Shoo Lee was across the ocean away in Canada, when these murders happened, whilst others who gave evidence? Well some of them were actually in the very hospital where the murders happened.

Letby’s campaigners often like to falsely portray the prosecution case as being based upon flawed analysis/findings/judgment coming from just one witness i.e. the retired paediatrician Dr Dewi Evans.

HOWEVER his analysis/opinion/evidence was peer-reviewed and signed off by the late Dr Martin Ward Platt, whom is justifiably described as an “eminent neonatologist”.

The case was examined in court using such notable/expert witnesses as neonatologist Dr Sandie Bohin...forensic pathologist Dr Andreas Marnerides...paediatric radiologist Professor Owen Arthurs...paediatric haematologist Professor Sally Kinsey...paediatric endocrinologist Professor Peter Hindmarsh...paediatric surgeon Dr Simon Kenney...and paediatric neuroradiologist Professor Stavros Stivaros, as well as other medical experts and numerous doctors at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

The CCRC will have full access and be privy to Crown Court trial transcripts, that cannot be tainted, cannot be rewritten to become 'make believe' whilst someone is looking the other way.
Click to expand...
I understand that the expert witnesses for the prosecution were paid for their opinions, whereas the Dr Shoo Lee experts were independent and unpaid.
 
The new "evidence" just happens to have been brought by the defence team of Lucy Letby.
I am a patron of the Innocence Project, so I am well aware that miscarriages of justice are real and frequent. I would just err on the side of caution. "New" evidence very often isnt new. Its just a reframing of the evidence already considered.
 
Captain_Sham said:
The new "evidence" just happens to have been brought by the defence team of Lucy Letby.
I am a patron of the Innocence Project, so I am well aware that miscarriages of justice are real and frequent. I would just err on the side of caution. "New" evidence very often isnt new. Its just a reframing of the evidence already considered.
Click to expand...
That is indeed the correct way to proceed i.e. a case of do NOT fully trust the newspapers…. Do NOT fully trust the media….Do NOT fully trust cr@p 'make believe' books written by pathological liars.

Do NOT trust ‘urban myths’ and lies and gossip that comes from mums gatherings at school gates, hairdresser saloons and pubs etc.

Let the CCRC get on with their job, which I guess bearing in mind all the scientific information and participants is going to be some arduous time consuming task. It’s going to be a lever arch Mount Everest climb.
 
Believe crackpots that post on association football forums. Yep, definitely that.
 
Pentyrchjack said:
I understand that the expert witnesses for the prosecution were paid for their opinions, whereas the Dr Shoo Lee experts were independent and unpaid.
Click to expand...
I think it’s also worth pointing out that Dr Shoo Lee is the guy who wrote a medical paper that one of the prosecution’s subject matter experts referenced when giving his evidence.
There needs to be a thorough, impartial investigation and no stone should be left unturned.
 
Darran said:
Panorama tonight.
Very interesting.
Click to expand...
A few more twists and turns to go with this one. It's amazing how ones opinion can shift when looking in from the outside. Let's hope this can be resolved once and for all.
 
Wing_Stand_Wood said:
That is indeed the correct way to proceed i.e. a case of do NOT fully trust the newspapers…. Do NOT fully trust the media….Do NOT fully trust cr@p 'make believe' books written by pathological liars.

Do NOT trust ‘urban myths’ and lies and gossip that comes from mums gatherings at school gates, hairdresser saloons and pubs etc.

Let the CCRC get on with their job, which I guess bearing in mind all the scientific information and participants is going to be some arduous time consuming task. It’s going to be a lever arch Mount Everest climb.
Click to expand...
If it was kosher, then why has Dr Dewi changed his mind and denied some of the stuff
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BrynCartwright
Lucy Worsley : Black Death
Replies
3
Views
914
K23 K23
K23
TheLoneRanger
Three arrests in Letby hospital investigation ...
Replies
0
Views
292
TheLoneRanger TheLoneRanger
TheLoneRanger

Members online

Total: 9,635 (members: 3, guests: 9,632)
Most visitors online was 23949 , on 14 Feb 26
Back
Top