Lucy Letby

[jack_lord]

It would be convenient for the NHS if Letby were the scapegoat to cover their own systemic failures.

That would not surprise me in the slightest. I'm not saying she is innocent but this information is going to clusterfuck the original case.

 

[Wing_Stand_Wood]

The trouble with this new evidence? Is Dr Shoo Lee was across the ocean away in Canada, when these murders happened, whilst others who gave evidence? Well some of them were actually in the very hospital where the murders happened.

Letby’s campaigners often like to falsely portray the prosecution case as being based upon flawed analysis/findings/judgment coming from just one witness i.e. the retired paediatrician Dr Dewi Evans.

HOWEVER his analysis/opinion/evidence was peer-reviewed and signed off by the late Dr Martin Ward Platt, whom is justifiably described as an “eminent neonatologist”.

The case was examined in court using such notable/expert witnesses as neonatologist Dr Sandie Bohin...forensic pathologist Dr Andreas Marnerides...paediatric radiologist Professor Owen Arthurs...paediatric haematologist Professor Sally Kinsey...paediatric endocrinologist Professor Peter Hindmarsh...paediatric surgeon Dr Simon Kenney...and paediatric neuroradiologist Professor Stavros Stivaros, as well as other medical experts and numerous doctors at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

The CCRC will have full access and be privy to Crown Court trial transcripts, that cannot be tainted, cannot be rewritten to become 'make believe' whilst someone is looking the other way.

 

[Pentyrchjack]

The trouble with this new evidence? Is Dr Shoo Lee was across the ocean away in Canada, when these murders happened, whilst others who gave evidence? Well some of them were actually in the very hospital where the murders happened.

Letby’s campaigners often like to falsely portray the prosecution case as being based upon flawed analysis/findings/judgment coming from just one witness i.e. the retired paediatrician Dr Dewi Evans.

HOWEVER his analysis/opinion/evidence was peer-reviewed and signed off by the late Dr Martin Ward Platt, whom is justifiably described as an “eminent neonatologist”.

The case was examined in court using such notable/expert witnesses as neonatologist Dr Sandie Bohin...forensic pathologist Dr Andreas Marnerides...paediatric radiologist Professor Owen Arthurs...paediatric haematologist Professor Sally Kinsey...paediatric endocrinologist Professor Peter Hindmarsh...paediatric surgeon Dr Simon Kenney...and paediatric neuroradiologist Professor Stavros Stivaros, as well as other medical experts and numerous doctors at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

The CCRC will have full access and be privy to Crown Court trial transcripts, that cannot be tainted, cannot be rewritten to become 'make believe' whilst someone is looking the other way.

I understand that the expert witnesses for the prosecution were paid for their opinions, whereas the Dr Shoo Lee experts were independent and unpaid.

 

[Captain_Sham]

The new "evidence" just happens to have been brought by the defence team of Lucy Letby.
I am a patron of the Innocence Project, so I am well aware that miscarriages of justice are real and frequent. I would just err on the side of caution. "New" evidence very often isnt new. Its just a reframing of the evidence already considered.

 

[Captain_Sham]

If you are interested in this kind of thing, check out "The Innocence Files" on Netflix. Also "The Confession Tapes".

 

[Wing_Stand_Wood]

The new "evidence" just happens to have been brought by the defence team of Lucy Letby.
I am a patron of the Innocence Project, so I am well aware that miscarriages of justice are real and frequent. I would just err on the side of caution. "New" evidence very often isnt new. Its just a reframing of the evidence already considered.

That is indeed the correct way to proceed i.e. a case of do NOT fully trust the newspapers…. Do NOT fully trust the media….Do NOT fully trust cr@p 'make believe' books written by pathological liars.

Do NOT trust ‘urban myths’ and lies and gossip that comes from mums gatherings at school gates, hairdresser saloons and pubs etc.

Let the CCRC get on with their job, which I guess bearing in mind all the scientific information and participants is going to be some arduous time consuming task. It’s going to be a lever arch Mount Everest climb.

 

[Neath_Jack]

Believe crackpots that post on association football forums. Yep, definitely that.

 

[MajorR]

I understand that the expert witnesses for the prosecution were paid for their opinions, whereas the Dr Shoo Lee experts were independent and unpaid.

I think it’s also worth pointing out that Dr Shoo Lee is the guy who wrote a medical paper that one of the prosecution’s subject matter experts referenced when giving his evidence.
There needs to be a thorough, impartial investigation and no stone should be left unturned.