• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Mumford & Sons

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 22
  • Views Views: Views 3,486
I think they’re crap but if what he says is true if they had any substance they’d beg him to stay on and back him.
 
Itchysphincter said:
I think they’re crap but if what he says is true if they had any substance they’d beg him to stay on and back him.

Reading that, it sounds like that's exactly what they did.

Seems strange to leave a band which is presumably making you rich because you got hammered on Twitter. Just close your Twatter account and get on with your life. If you're asked about it in an interview, just refuse to comment.

I don't understand the view that he won't 'self-censor' and so has to leave the band. I'm in no doubt there are celebrities who like things that would shock the majority of the world, so they keep that information private.

I'd guess there's more going on with his leaving than what's been said.
 
JackSomething said:
Itchysphincter said:
I think they’re crap but if what he says is true if they had any substance they’d beg him to stay on and back him.

Reading that, it sounds like that's exactly what they did.

Seems strange to leave a band which is presumably making you rich because you got hammered on Twitter. Just close your Twatter account and get on with your life. If you're asked about it in an interview, just refuse to comment.

I don't understand the view that he won't 'self-censor' and so has to leave the band. I'm in no doubt there are celebrities who like things that would shock the majority of the world, so they keep that information private.

I'd guess there's more going on with his leaving than what's been said.

I did think he might just be attention seeking.
 
Good for him for drawing attention to the ignorant militant activists who to thrive on social media.
 
Darran said:
Jackmanandboy said:
Good for him for drawing attention to the ignorant militant activists who to thrive on social media.

I agree.

He got sh*t for praising literal fascist literature you melt.
 
If you think fascists and anti fascists are equal opposites, not only are you a thick c**t, you’re an actual danger to society.

Every citizen who loves a free and tolerant society has a moral obligation to be unambiguously anti fascist.
 
Darran said:
AceJack said:
He got sh*t for praising literal fascist literature you melt.

He didn’t praise it he said the author was brave for writing it.

Would you not class that as praise? Also the author is at best an opportunistic con man grifter and at worst an amplifier of and participant in violent fascist groups. So he can go with the “I was too rich and thick to understand what I was saying” but the “left got too PC and cancelled me” excuse is for the birds.

If you think the author was brave you’re either not acting in good faith or you haven’t done an ounce of research on the author. So he’s either a thick c*nt or a bit fashy. Take your pick.
 
AceJack said:
Darran said:
He didn’t praise it he said the author was brave for writing it.

Would you not class that as praise? Also the author is at best an opportunistic con man grifter and at worst an amplifier of and participant in violent fascist groups. So he can go with the “I was too rich and thick to understand what I was saying” but the “left got too PC and cancelled me” excuse is for the birds.

If you think the author was brave you’re either not acting in bad faith or you haven’t done an ounce of research on the author. So he’s either a thick c*nt or a bit fashy. Take your pick.

Oh fućk off you sanctimonious ćunt.
 
Darran said:
AceJack said:
Would you not class that as praise? Also the author is at best an opportunistic con man grifter and at worst an amplifier of and participant in violent fascist groups. So he can go with the “I was too rich and thick to understand what I was saying” but the “left got too PC and cancelled me” excuse is for the birds.

If you think the author was brave you’re either not acting in bad faith or you haven’t done an ounce of research on the author. So he’s either a thick c*nt or a bit fashy. Take your pick.

Oh fućk off you sanctimonious ćunt.

He’s done you like a kipper. Again.
 
Darran said:
AceJack said:
Would you not class that as praise? Also the author is at best an opportunistic con man grifter and at worst an amplifier of and participant in violent fascist groups. So he can go with the “I was too rich and thick to understand what I was saying” but the “left got too PC and cancelled me” excuse is for the birds.

If you think the author was brave you’re either not acting in bad faith or you haven’t done an ounce of research on the author. So he’s either a thick c*nt or a bit fashy. Take your pick.

Oh fućk off you sanctimonious ćunt.

Antifascism is sanctimony now. Good one.

While I’ve got your attention maybe you can actually do a millisecond of googling to find out a bit more about the “brave author” you and a millionaire banjo player are so keen to defend.

Maybe you can start with all the times he pretended to have a British accent to appear more intelligent. Or the time he said a milkshake gave him a brain haemorrhage.

Have fun.

https://youtu.be/gtZHUYVVJEU
 

Swansea City 🦢v Hull City 🐯

Back
Top