Most visitors online was 2766 , on 14 Oct 24
bakajack said:It would certainly make maintenance of the pitch easier from Swansea's perspective albeit at a loss in whatever the Ospreys pay for rent.
Honestly I would be lying if I said that I had any clue about how much the Osprey's average attendance was but its clear that its nowhere near the 21,000 capacity of the current stadium. Considering how not just for me but for many others domestic rugby has far, far less appeal than international rugby and I would be surprised if it was half that outside of huge games like the derby against Cardiff.
monmouth said:I should think most would say 'good riddance' - and it's not good for them to play in an echo chamber neither.
Thing is though, now we've oh so cleverly bought the stadium, instead of having a super sweet peppercorn rental deal, it's an income stream.
add, having read the WoL blurb - is he really that stupid? His number one priority should be survival and funding. Plus, selling out a small stadium against Benneton on a Friday night (there isn't a stadium small enough by the way) is of no benefit if it's the same number of tickets but in a smaller ground, just because you sell out rather than have lots of excess capacity. It's like the scum moving to Rodney Parade and filling it now and again instead of having vast swathes of empty seats in their 'big' ground. Pointless.
Neath_Jack said:Similar to us, we'll be rattling around in an empty stadium if fans continue to stay away and dwindle much further.
Niigata Jack said:Swans can move down to Ashley Road mun!
Thats a really good point. I vaguely remember that one of the conditions of the council sale was 'protection' of the bloody Ospreys arrangement. If that's true, you're right, it may be a net outflow.I can't imagine there was a huge hike in the rent the Ospreys pay since we bought the stadium, and I can't remember too many complaints from them at the time of the sale, so I'd have a guess that they're still at peppercorn or there abouts. It also should be noted that the cost of playing here isn't mentioned in their statement about moving. That being the case, I wonder how much higher the rent they pay is than the additional ground maintenance cost of having them here?
Caught a glimpse of the Ospreys match on the tv and it looked to me like there were more at the away end at Birmingham than at the .com on Friday. Whatever they're claiming the attendance was (and rugby clubs aren't famed for accurate reporting of attendances, usually rounding up to the nearest thousand up from the actual gate) looked worse than the attendances of around 3,000 we regularly attracted to the Vetch in the 90s.Similar to us, we'll be rattling around in an empty stadium if fans continue to stay away and dwindle much further.