I can't read the article, but the gist is they're sueing an insurance company?
Doesn't this contradict their whole strategy from that beginning of saying he wasn't their player? Because why would you insure s player who is isn't yours?
I'm sure they've publicly they didn't have any insurance? (If they had, surely they'd have just claimed on it and avoided all this nonsense?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.