• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Ronaldo

Got to admit I am surprised this happened, I didn't think he would ever want to risk diluting his legacy he left at Utd
 
Clearly, he still wants to play in a top league otherwise he would have gone to the MLS or China for easy money
 
CurtessECarr said:
28m euros. Great player lot of money for a 36year old.

I imagine his wages will cost considerably more. Hell of a gamble, especially when everyone else seems to think they have a more immediate need for a quality holding midfielder.

Juventus gambled that he'd be the push they needed to win the CL. It didn't work, so will it give United the push to win the league?

I'm just glad that the oil barons didn't get to sign Kane or Ronaldo this summer.
 
JackSomething said:
CurtessECarr said:
28m euros. Great player lot of money for a 36year old.

I imagine his wages will cost considerably more. Hell of a gamble, especially when everyone else seems to think they have a more immediate need for a quality holding midfielder.

Juventus gambled that he'd be the push they needed to win the CL. It didn't work, so will it give United the push to win the league?

I'm just glad that the oil barons didn't get to sign Kane or Ronaldo this summer.

Not really a gamble. The commercial impact of him signing will go a long way to offsetting their outlay.

If the price of £12.8m is to be believed then I would call this a no-brainer.
 
Pegojack said:
Watching him in the Euros, I thought unsurprisingly he'd lost a lot of pace. Can he still hack it in the Prem?

There's plenty of pace around him at utd. His presence will free up space for the others and he's probably good for at least 10 headed goals a year, something utd forwards aren't great at.
 
JackSomething said:
CurtessECarr said:
28m euros. Great player lot of money for a 36year old.

I imagine his wages will cost considerably more. Hell of a gamble, especially when everyone else seems to think they have a more immediate need for a quality holding midfielder.

Juventus gambled that he'd be the push they needed to win the CL. It didn't work, so will it give United the push to win the league?

I'm just glad that the oil barons didn't get to sign Kane or Ronaldo this summer.

Do you look less favourably on oil barons, than other businessmen such as the Glazers?

Utd have been doing it for years, whilst City are the newcomers. Two cheeks of the same arsehole.
 
Great new for the Prem, can wait to see him play and hopefully he still has all is skills.
 
Could be one of the best premier league seasons ever
Unless your harry Kane , still stuck at spurs where a league cup is the dream
 
Cooperman said:
JackSomething said:
I imagine his wages will cost considerably more. Hell of a gamble, especially when everyone else seems to think they have a more immediate need for a quality holding midfielder.

Juventus gambled that he'd be the push they needed to win the CL. It didn't work, so will it give United the push to win the league?

I'm just glad that the oil barons didn't get to sign Kane or Ronaldo this summer.

Not really a gamble. The commercial impact of him signing will go a long way to offsetting their outlay.

If the price of £12.8m is to be believed then I would call this a no-brainer.

The price is no big deal, but if you search online, he's quoted as earning anything from £25m to more than £30m a year in wages at Juventus. I doubt he's going to accept a pay cut to join them, so he could cost them over £43m this season. They could surely have addressed a bigger weakness in the team with that kind of money.

You're probably right about it being a no-brainer though, even at those kind of figures. You mention commercial impact, then there's the boost he'll bring to the players and fans, plus the importance (from a symbolic and football point of view) of stopping him going to City.
 
Neath_Jack said:
JackSomething said:
I imagine his wages will cost considerably more. Hell of a gamble, especially when everyone else seems to think they have a more immediate need for a quality holding midfielder.

Juventus gambled that he'd be the push they needed to win the CL. It didn't work, so will it give United the push to win the league?

I'm just glad that the oil barons didn't get to sign Kane or Ronaldo this summer.

Do you look less favourably on oil barons, than other businessmen such as the Glazers?

Utd have been doing it for years, whilst City are the newcomers. Two cheeks of the same arsehole.

I don't like United, but like Liverpool, they generated their money themselves. The Glazers actually cost the club money as owners, which is a far cry from the way City's owners throw money at the club. Massive difference.

If City's owners disappeared, the club would sink back to mid-table obscurity at best without a similarly wealthy owner coming in. If the Glazers sold United, they generate enough money commercially to keep themselves at the top table. Which is something the owners do deserve credit for, they take their money out of the club, but they've also maximised their commercial income with official noodle sponsors and all the rest.
 
JackSomething said:
Cooperman said:
Not really a gamble. The commercial impact of him signing will go a long way to offsetting their outlay.

If the price of £12.8m is to be believed then I would call this a no-brainer.

The price is no big deal, but if you search online, he's quoted as earning anything from £25m to more than £30m a year in wages at Juventus. I doubt he's going to accept a pay cut to join them, so he could cost them over £43m this season. They could surely have addressed a bigger weakness in the team with that kind of money.

You're probably right about it being a no-brainer though, even at those kind of figures. You mention commercial impact, then there's the boost he'll bring to the players and fans, plus the importance (from a symbolic and football point of view) of stopping him going to City.

That's part of the point. Their financial forecast won't show a £43m negative deficit, far from it. Their global fan base will be creaming themselves over this.
 

Swansea City v Leeds United

Online statistics

Members online
30
Guests online
312
Total visitors
342

Forum statistics

Threads
19,172
Messages
266,840
Members
4,701
Back
Top