Shamima Begum can return to UK to fight citizenship, Court of Appeal rules

[Neath_Jack]

Did the Netherlands stop her husband returning?

No idea butt.

I have no interest in how the Netherlands practice law, or how they treat their citizens.

It has no bearing on my life in the UK.

I tell you what would have a bearing on your life in the UK butt, is if one of your family members had their head taken off by a suicide bomber at an Ariana Grande concert, the one which she said she supported

She left, she knew what she was doing, now she’s f*cked.

I don't know what you're having a pop at me for champ, I'm just saying what the law says.

You could point out where i said i agree with what she done, or what is happening, I'll wait.

I'm willing to have a quid with you that she is allowed to come back, and stays here too.

 

[Neath_Jack]

I tell you what would have a bearing on your life in the UK butt, is if one of your family members had their head taken off by a suicide bomber at an Ariana Grande concert, the one which she said she supported

She left, she knew what she was doing, now she’s f*cked.

Yeah but think of the bearing it’s going to have on his life in the UK if she doesn’t come back though. lol

Would probably be offended for a day, retweet a few tweets from Corbyn, then forget she ever existed.

You feeling okay? Why would i retweet Corbyn, or be offended?

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Anyone who agrees with the decision to allow her back into the country, are lunatics.

I agree with it. She should go through due process like everyone else. It’s why we have laws and courts. The government knew all along this would happen when they stripped her of citizenship. They did it anyway safe in the knowledge that the courts would overturn the decision because, y’know, the law, and then they could say “well we tried but those bloody judges again”. It was pretty transparent all along and I said as much on the old forum at the time. Worked a treat though for the government. Again.

Have the Netherlands let her husband back in yet? Not pretending to know much about the case, only read snippets, but doesn't she also hold Bangladeshi citizenship? Maybe it's best for the court case to be over there, where the death penalty can come into play.

This is someone who has publicly supported the Manchester attacks, beheadings, the rape of Yazidi women, a danger to society.

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

 

[Darran]

I agree with it. She should go through due process like everyone else. It’s why we have laws and courts. The government knew all along this would happen when they stripped her of citizenship. They did it anyway safe in the knowledge that the courts would overturn the decision because, y’know, the law, and then they could say “well we tried but those bloody judges again”. It was pretty transparent all along and I said as much on the old forum at the time. Worked a treat though for the government. Again.

Have the Netherlands let her husband back in yet? Not pretending to know much about the case, only read snippets, but doesn't she also hold Bangladeshi citizenship? Maybe it's best for the court case to be over there, where the death penalty can come into play.

This is someone who has publicly supported the Manchester attacks, beheadings, the rape of Yazidi women, a danger to society.

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Leave her over there whilst the court case goes on over here then. She can be there on Zoom. lol

 

[Risc]

I agree with it. She should go through due process like everyone else. It’s why we have laws and courts. The government knew all along this would happen when they stripped her of citizenship. They did it anyway safe in the knowledge that the courts would overturn the decision because, y’know, the law, and then they could say “well we tried but those bloody judges again”. It was pretty transparent all along and I said as much on the old forum at the time. Worked a treat though for the government. Again.

Have the Netherlands let her husband back in yet? Not pretending to know much about the case, only read snippets, but doesn't she also hold Bangladeshi citizenship? Maybe it's best for the court case to be over there, where the death penalty can come into play.

This is someone who has publicly supported the Manchester attacks, beheadings, the rape of Yazidi women, a danger to society.

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

 

[Toronto_Motors]

Have the Netherlands let her husband back in yet? Not pretending to know much about the case, only read snippets, but doesn't she also hold Bangladeshi citizenship? Maybe it's best for the court case to be over there, where the death penalty can come into play.

This is someone who has publicly supported the Manchester attacks, beheadings, the rape of Yazidi women, a danger to society.

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

Bottom line is how we protect our people.Risking the rights of a terrorist isnt sensible to me.And she is until it is PROVEN otherwise.It hasn't and cannot be.Why,because we cannot get inside her mind,as some think they can.

The death at MEN and other places overides everything for me.

I'm probably a racist,looking around here,but que sera

 

[Darran]

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

Bottom line is how we protect our people.Risking the rights of a terrorist isnt sensible to me.And she is until it is PROVEN otherwise.It hasn't and cannot be.Why,because we cannot get inside her mind,as some think they can.

The death at MEN and other places overides everything for me.

I'm probably a racist,looking around here,but que sera

Oh you’re definitely a racist your twitter account proves that and a Tory príck too.

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Have the Netherlands let her husband back in yet? Not pretending to know much about the case, only read snippets, but doesn't she also hold Bangladeshi citizenship? Maybe it's best for the court case to be over there, where the death penalty can come into play.

This is someone who has publicly supported the Manchester attacks, beheadings, the rape of Yazidi women, a danger to society.

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

Yes. Britain has stripped her of her British citizenship. The court ruled she can come back to the U.K. to appeal that decision.

So how can an a decision about whether someone is British or not be made by a court in Bangladesh?

 

[exiledclaseboy]

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

Bottom line is how we protect our people.Risking the rights of a terrorist isnt sensible to me.And she is until it is PROVEN otherwise.It hasn't and cannot be.Why,because we cannot get inside her mind,as some think they can.

The death at MEN and other places overides everything for me.

I'm probably a racist,looking around here,but que sera

Probably?

 

[Risc]

How can a court case to decide on her British citizenship be held in Bangladesh?

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

Yes. Britain has stripped her of her British citizenship. The court ruled she can come back to the U.K. to appeal that decision.

So how can an a decision about whether someone is British or not be made by a court in Bangladesh?

She’s appealing that decision, nothings been passed. If they can prove she isn’t stateless due to being a citizen of Bangladesh, I’m assuming she will face the courts over on terrorism charges

 

[exiledclaseboy]

Britain are arguing she is a citizen of Bangladesh through her mother, hence not stateless.

Yes. Britain has stripped her of her British citizenship. The court ruled she can come back to the U.K. to appeal that decision.

So how can an a decision about whether someone is British or not be made by a court in Bangladesh?

She’s appealing that decision, nothings been passed. If they can prove she isn’t stateless due to being a citizen of Bangladesh, I’m assuming she will face the courts over on terrorism charges

Yes, that’s what I said. But you initially said the case should be held in Bangladesh. If the U.K. government wins the appeal she’ll be deported. If she ever makes it back here anyway which seems unlikely given where she currently is. If she wins the appeal I’d imagine she’ll find herself on some charge or other too. Either way she’s our problem for now, not Bangladesh’s. They’ve said they want nothing to do with her by the way, and refute the suggestion that she’s entitled to Bangladeshi citizenship. Can’t say I blame them.

 

[Risc]

Yes. Britain has stripped her of her British citizenship. The court ruled she can come back to the U.K. to appeal that decision.

So how can an a decision about whether someone is British or not be made by a court in Bangladesh?

She’s appealing that decision, nothings been passed. If they can prove she isn’t stateless due to being a citizen of Bangladesh, I’m assuming she will face the courts over on terrorism charges

Yes, that’s what I said. But you initially said the case should be held in Bangladesh. If the U.K. government wins the appeal she’ll be deported. If she ever makes it back here anyway which seems unlikely given where she currently is. If she wins the appeal I’d imagine she’ll find herself on some charge or other too. Either way she’s our problem for now, not Bangladesh’s. They’ve said they want nothing to do with her by the way, and refute the suggestion that she’s entitled to Bangladeshi citizenship. Can’t say I blame them.

I assumed because a tribunal said in February Britain was acting within law due to her being a citizen of Bangladesh, it would also be their problem so to speak. If she ended up there I don’t think she would have to worry about Western Values for much longer. They’ve already said there would be no clemency.

 

[Flashberryjack]

Who is funding her legal team ?

 

[Pete3001]

Good question

 

[Sherpa]

The country where she was radicalized must take ultimate responsibility for her.