Itchysphincter said:
It didn't really work though did it? It was too late for that sort of lockdown. People will die for many years as a result of it so it can be argued that the virus is responsible for many more deaths. By your reckoning it worked because the numbers of infections are rising post lockdwown but what about the death numbers? Everyone praised New Zealand - lockdown worked a treat, then they eased it and shat the bed. Sweden had a more measured approach which didn't kill their economy or restrict civil liberties and their comparative figures are no worse than any lockdown country. You still have to deal with it when you come out.
In the absence of a vaccine all a lockdown can do is delay, which was what was originally suggested. The whole thing was sold as "flattening the curve" from day one. Protect the NHS. Now people seem to think they can be implemented indefinitely until the virus is gone. Newsflash: The virus isn't going anywhere.
New Zealand's job in locking down a sparsely populated country far from major travel routes in the middle of their summer when respiratory viruses generally spread less was relatively easy, if oddly overpraised. Not a great surprise to see increased cases both there and in Australia. Both nations are going to have ongoing problems dealing with International travel.