• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

The Liverpool incident.

Depends on what his motive was. I’m sure the police are considering it but given the charges so far (there’ll be more) it doesn’t look like a terrorist act to me.

What is odd is the number of people looking to find reasons for his actions. “PTSD” “perhaps he panicked” “the scousers attacked his car first” “he found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time”. One or more of these mitigations may end up being true. They may not. But regardless, I’m absolutely certain we wouldn’t be seeing so much enthusiasm for this proposed mitigation if he looked less like a Paul Doyle and more like a (for example) Sadiq Khan.
Yes - I read somewhere that the case will centre on the question of intent.
 
Depends on what his motive was. I’m sure the police are considering it but given the charges so far (there’ll be more) it doesn’t look like a terrorist act to me.

What is odd is the number of people looking to find reasons for his actions. “PTSD” “perhaps he panicked” “the scousers attacked his car first” “he found himself in the wrong place at the wrong time”. One or more of these mitigations may end up being true. They may not. But regardless, I’m absolutely certain we wouldn’t be seeing so much enthusiasm for this proposed mitigation if he looked less like a Paul Doyle and more like a (for example) Sadiq Khan.

Thanks for the reply,still doesn’t answer my point though.
 
Paul’s comment on him not being charged with terrorism and is there anything to suggest he should have? (or shouldn’t have)
I’ve answered that. If Paul thinks he should be charged with a terrorism offence (he may well still be of course) it’s not for me to explain why Paul thinks that.
 
Definition of terrorism according to the act:
"the use or threat of certain actions, designed to influence the government or intimidate the public, for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause."
 
Definition of terrorism according to the act:
"the use or threat of certain actions, designed to influence the government or intimidate the public, for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause."
“Political, racial, religious and ideological”. Fairly wide ranging that.
 
Looks to me like this bloke is probably a bit of a mad bastard who got caught out trying to pull a fast one in a crowd of mostly pissed up people enjoying the day, things went badly quickly. Thankfully nobody lost thier life and speedy recovery to the injured.
 
Looks to me like this bloke is probably a bit of a mad bastard who got caught out trying to pull a fast one in a crowd of mostly pissed up people enjoying the day, things went badly quickly. Thankfully nobody lost thier life and speedy recovery to the injured.
Sounds the most likely scenario. I’d be amazed if the white marching powder wasn’t involved.
 
Certainly got you discussing it, it seems as if its the press that decides what it is here we have a white 50+ male being described as a wholesome family man.....because he's white, if he was brown well who knows what he would have been described as, it's what the press want, or the right wing scum bag press, of course it prob was nothing to do with terrorism but it shows dependant how easy that shit is to trot out out dependant on skin shade.............
 

Release of the 2025/26 Fixtures

Online statistics

Members online
46
Guests online
1,131
Total visitors
1,177

Forum statistics

Threads
23,486
Messages
318,717
Members
4,793
Back
Top