JackSomething
Alan Curtis
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
- Messages
- 3,858
- Reaction score
- 563
Thanks for the clarification. I looked at some of the articles written when the accounts were published and where the repayment of loans was mentioned, I overlooked this bit: "According to the strategic financial report accompanying the accounts, a key event after the financial year end was the repayment of loans from Reynolds and McElhenney, that had grown to £15m.".Not making comment on Wrexham’s finances, but the ‘fact’ going round that Wrexham have only made a loss dues to repayment of owners’ loans cannot be correct as repayment (or receipt) of a loan does not affect profit or loss. It’s a balance sheet and cash flow issue.
In the same way an owner putting in equity also does not affect profit and loss.
Rules are around profit and loss as well as cash flow. Owners can directly affect one (cash flow) but not the other.
Where Wrexham do win out is their ability to attract sponsorship due to their owners. Sponsorship income does affect profit and loss and allows them to spend more and remain within rules.
I didn't clock that meant the repayment of loans wasn't actually in the accounts.