• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Eni Aluko

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrSwerve
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 28
  • Views Views: Views 1,075
Jordan is trying to defend Jim Ratcliffe's comments on imagination and Whitey having non of it. The callers (most) are giving it tight to SJ now an all 👀
Hmm, I’m sure that Ratcliffe now looks back and wonders if he could have used a different choice of words.

Edit: he has apologised. SJ can now back down as well.
 
Last edited:
Wonder how some of man utd's players who come from across the globe feel after his reform supporting comments, not to mention the fans
 
Ratcliffe’s “apology” doesn’t sound like an apology to me.
He’s sorry that his “language offended some people”.
Why should he apologise. He has a right to his opinion.

You don't have to agree with him and you don't have the right not to be offended.
 
Why should he apologise. He has a right to his opinion.

You don't have to agree with him and you don't have the right not to be offended.
Show me where I said I was offended.
I commented on his “apology”. It’s up to him whether he decides to apologise or stick to his guns from his tax haven home in Monaco.
 
It didn’t need to drag out for 45 mins. They could have ended the misery at the first break.

Yep - she's definitely something that gets the clicks online.

Her interview with Andrew Gold on Heretics is glorious.
 
Show me where I said I was offended.
I commented on his “apology”. It’s up to him whether he decides to apologise or stick to his guns from his tax haven home in Monaco.
Another member of the elite preaching about immigrants when they don’t live in the country they pretend to love. Yaxley, Middleton, Tice, the list goes on and on. They’ve got the thickos eating from the palms of their hands.
 
Why should he apologise. He has a right to his opinion.

You don't have to agree with him and you don't have the right not to be offended.

I'd have more respect for him if he stuck by his original comments, even though I disagree with them. Offering the classic non-apology of 'sorry if anyone was offended' is a pathetic cop-out.
 
Ivory tower comments from on high, rightly called out for being a low blow to those who don’t have a platform to argue against said comments.

My biggest fear is that Parliament will soon be colonised by his sort in the form of Nigel Farage and Reform.

My biggest hope is that the Great British electorate will see them for what they are before the next election, but I have my doubts after the success of Trump 2.0 in the US.
 
Back
Top