Keir Starmer

[Smurph]

I tried it the other day regarding a piece of construction related legislation, and they got that wrong. Several times as well.

The concern is that it gets the very simple of things wrong. I want to know what a certain light in the car indicated and it told me there was a fault because the light was red. It was red to indicate the certain function was on and the color changed when you turned it off.

I tend to use it to bounce ideas off, when I creating training content, it's good form helping with getting the creative juices flowing.

The huge red flag for me is the amount of people I work with using it to write responses to emails they've just received. I tread to think what some people will be like in 10, 20 years from know.

I've noticed a huge drop in my spelling and grammar since using things like autocorrect in Word etc...

 

[Bullworker]

WITHOUT TRUTH THERE IS NOTHING. WITHOUT HILLSBOROUHJ ENGLAND S GOVERNMENT HAVE NIL NOTHING FA.

 

[J_B]

You could try italics for a bit of variation.

Italics bold is really fun.

Or big or small.

 

[MrSwerve]

WITHOUT TRUTH THERE IS NOTHING. WITHOUT HILLSBOROUHJ ENGLAND S GOVERNMENT HAVE NIL NOTHING FA.

Talking of AI, I asked ChatGPT to turn Bullworker’s post into something eloquent…

Without truth, there is nothing. Without truth, justice collapses, trust decays, and institutions lose all legitimacy. The Hillsborough disaster stands as a permanent reminder that when a government refuses honesty, accountability, and transparency, it forfeits its moral authority entirely. A state that conceals the truth does not merely fail its people — it becomes empty of credibility, empty of justice, and empty of any right to command resp

 

[Muteswan]

Talking of AI, I asked ChatGPT to turn Bullworker’s post into something eloquent…

Without truth, there is nothing. Without truth, justice collapses, trust decays, and institutions lose all legitimacy. The Hillsborough disaster stands as a permanent reminder that when a government refuses honesty, accountability, and transparency, it forfeits its moral authority entirely. A state that conceals the truth does not merely fail its people — it becomes empty of credibility, empty of justice, and empty of any right to command resp

Well that was plainly obvious.

 

[jack123]

The concern is that it gets the very simple of things wrong. I want to know what a certain light in the car indicated and it told me there was a fault because the light was red. It was red to indicate the certain function was on and the color changed when you turned it off.

I tend to use it to bounce ideas off, when I creating training content, it's good form helping with getting the creative juices flowing.

The huge red flag for me is the amount of people I work with using it to write responses to emails they've just received. I tread to think what some people will be like in 10, 20 years from know.

I've noticed a huge drop in my spelling and grammar since using things like autocorrect in Word etc...

Good point, can AI even be trusted to give advice? Take for example earlier, I asked chat gpt to give me 2 players who are likely to be booked in the Burnley v West Ham game, one player chat gpt suggested was Paqueta, I said he doesn’t even play for West Ham , and it said was something like well spotted, and give another players name, but if the question was of a medical nature, then the consequences of making silly mistakes could be a lot more severe.

 

[Neath_Jack]

Good point, can AI even be trusted to give advice? Take for example earlier, I asked chat gpt to give me 2 players who are likely to be booked in the Burnley v West Ham game, one player chat gpt suggested was Paqueta, I said he doesn’t even play for West Ham , and it said was something like well spotted, and give another players name, but if the question was of a medical nature, then the consequences of making silly mistakes could be a lot more severe.

No is the answer.

 

[MrSwerve]

AI is brilliant but can't be trusted 100%.

One day, it will be though.

That's when the machines took over...

 

[JackSomething]

AI is brilliant but can't be trusted 100%.

One day, it will be though.

That's when the machines took over...

 

[Neath_Jack]

McSweeny gonners

Morgan McSweeney quits as PM's chief of staff following Mandelson scandal

McSweeney says he takes "full responsibility" for advising Keir Starmer to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Jack2jack]

McSweeny gonners

Morgan McSweeney quits as PM's chief of staff following Mandelson scandal

McSweeney says he takes "full responsibility" for advising Keir Starmer to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Robbie]

No time for Starmer since his CV and Policies were announced at the GE last year .

A Sir representing The Labour Party will really go down well in the Welsh Valleys hence why he has not visited us over here even in the Sennedd run ins to the finishing post .

Asks the question can the media destroy a persons reputation via Press and online mud slinging , mybe that is the way forward for new voters now .

Randy Andy is toast now anyway , good news .

 

[Glyn1]

Boris Johnson and Liz Truss have been Prime Ministers in the last 5 years, and it's Starmer who is "the most unpopular PM in British history"?? I guess it shows how influential the Daily Mail and Daily Express are.

 

[Glyn1]

For information, the last 6 Conservative PMs were William Hague, David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak.

 

[J_B]

For information, the last 6 Conservative PMs were William Hague, David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak.

I don't think Hague was ever Prime Minister.