• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Andrew

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smurph
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 69
  • Views Views: Views 1,243
I'm interested in the line "his protection officers knowingly turned a blind eye"

I mean who exactly was going to grass him up, especially given how much of a nasty piece of work he allegedly is.
 
See, back in the day he was lovingly called "Randy Andy" by the mainstream tabloids. So he had a reputation in the 90's as a bit of a lad.The fact he was sowing his seed along with Epstein, with under age children, isn't a great look now. Tick tick tick.
 
Not sure if anyone else heard David Dimbleby on Radio 4's one o'clock news programme? The former arse licker in chief has done a proper U Turn on the royals. He insinuated the truth will come out about who paid the £20m plus settlement money to VG and it may or may not have been the public purse, he said the Monarchy exists as a closed sect in a closed conspiracy circle, and he even suggested the Queen's movements were unusual at the time of Diana's death.
 
Not sure if anyone else heard David Dimbleby on Radio 4's one o'clock news programme? The former arse licker in chief has done a proper U Turn on the royals. He insinuated the truth will come out about who paid the £20m plus settlement money to VG and it may or may not have been the public purse, he said the Monarchy exists as a closed sect in a closed conspiracy circle, and he even suggested the Queen's movements were unusual at the time of Diana's death.
 
It was an awful screening later on tele on his wording of events , I was cringing .

From the opening attitude to The Royals and Charlie it was on a par with Randy Andys car crash interview on BBC Newsnight back in the day .

Just why do some of these broadcasters and minor celebs talk unrehearsed or unscripted .

Hangers on , and Fergie will be gone soon to pastures new hopefully .
 
No one in the royal family can do anything without our secret services knowing. He had his protection officers with him at Epstein’s place. It is simply not credible that they didn’t know.

Every one of the emails that came from him will have been seen. Half of them were coming from Balmoral or Buckingham palace. So the emails that are him saying ‘here Jeffrey, a bit of knowledge that may be useful to you’ will have been picked up in real time. As will the ‘thanks for the company…’ emails.

Heck, half the governments in the world will have known about all of this. They’ll all have all the files. None of them released it because they all have people at the top involved.
That seems to me to have been the point of the whole thing.
When and how do you think the Queen/Charles were informed about AMW sharing sensitive trade data?
 
Back
Top