• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Another shooting in America

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 47
  • Views Views: Views 4,069
Professor said:
CurtessECarr said:
Had to check their constitution. Right to arms since 1771. Wow of course things haven't moved on for 250years.

1791

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed


The amendment was put in place to ensure protection against a British re-invasion. Which came in the war of 1812-including the burning of Washington and the White House. Subsequently the supreme court defined this as the right to the individual.
OOPS 1791 is correct. I thought it might have been to protect against them pesky Injuns. :P
 
He had a racial slur written on his gun but the shooting is nothing to do with racism apparently.
 
Tell you what's amazing, when a brown person carries out an atrocity, they are dirty stinking terrorists and their countrymen should come out and apologise on behalf of their race / religion. When a white man does it, he is mentally ill and not race related. Incredible, every single time. You can see an example of it on similar forums to this.
 
Neath_Jack said:
Tell you what's amazing, when a brown person carries out an atrocity, they are dirty stinking terrorists and their countrymen should come out and apologise on behalf of their race / religion. When a white man does it, he is mentally ill and not race related. Incredible, every single time. You can see an example of it on similar forums to this.

I think that goes both ways, just depends what your source is. Left-leaning Reddit for example likes to distance race when a black person commits a crime but are quick to associate it when a white person does. Both sides have their biases and most people are hypocrites
 
Neath_Jack said:
Tell you what's amazing, when a brown person carries out an atrocity, they are dirty stinking terrorists and their countrymen should come out and apologise on behalf of their race / religion. When a white man does it, he is mentally ill and not race related. Incredible, every single time. You can see an example of it on similar forums to this.

Yep and one of them was describing Tucker Carlson as a fantastic reporter and the shooter was obviously mentally ill which I sort of agree on the latter as white supremacy is a mental illness.
 
I was just reading an article on police brutality and it got me thinking... America is a country wherein most states it's perfectly legal to drive around whilst shooting videos and taking selfies on your mobile phone, but jaywalking because there's ice on the pavement results in a police search and criminal record. Bizarre place.
 
Darran said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/24/texas-school-shooting-uvalde-robb-elementary

Yeah but it’s their right to bear arms innit.

Absolutely tragic. Imagine sending your child to school every morning and hoping they don’t get shot 🤯😫

RIP young ones.
 
Glyn1 said:
Nothing is going to change because of this.

Of course it won't , a few days of the same old thoughts and prayers and they will continue voting for pro nra candidates , they won't give up guns now as half the country think they will need them for the second civil war , crazy country
 
It's being reported that the gunman purchased 2 assault rifles on his 18th birthday - yet he cannot celebrate his birthday in a bar for another 3 years.

Absolutely fvcking crazy!!
 
If you want to keep the second amendment, you have to put up with kids dying in schools.

It’s a simple calculation and most Americans who vote in the states that matter think it’s a price worth paying. Just ask our transatlantic posters.
 
I can’t get my head around some of these c*nts.

https://twitter.com/voterandyfine/status/1529427654839046144?s=21&t=E5o-DCzZb9FGAFF_G28BRw
 
Darran said:
I can’t get my head around some of these c*nts.

https://twitter.com/voterandyfine/status/1529427654839046144?s=21&t=E5o-DCzZb9FGAFF_G28BRw

https://twitter.com/msnbc/status/1529520935237214209?s=21&t=TNH7eGmlAldMv5TZmwh2Lw
 
It's mental health though isn't it?
The 'playstation generation" who think you can shoot someone or be shot and then they/you will come back to life!!!!
Only once you can die FFS!

People aged 17 can't buy a beer but if they are having a "bad day' they can buy a gun.

Shit for brains country, always has been and always will.
Massive egos and deluded.
 
Back
Top