CurtessECarr
Tommy Hutchison
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
- Messages
- 1,429
- Reaction score
- 175
OOPS 1791 is correct. I thought it might have been to protect against them pesky Injuns.Professor said:CurtessECarr said:Had to check their constitution. Right to arms since 1771. Wow of course things haven't moved on for 250years.
1791
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
The amendment was put in place to ensure protection against a British re-invasion. Which came in the war of 1812-including the burning of Washington and the White House. Subsequently the supreme court defined this as the right to the individual.