• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Azeem Abdulai today for Orient

  • Thread starter Thread starter magicdaps10
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 70
  • Views Views: Views 8,875
Abdulai may turn out to be a fine player, he may not. What annoys me is that we sold a homegrown player for peanuts without him ever getting the chance to play in his actual position.

I'd like to think we put a buy-back clause in there in case he does become a fine player, but I can't see it.
 
Can anyone genuinely explain to me, bar that he was a bad egg for which there's no evidence, why we wouldn't loan him out instead of selling for peanuts?
 
Abdulai may turn out to be a fine player, he may not. What annoys me is that we sold a homegrown player for peanuts without him ever getting the chance to play in his actual position.

I'd like to think we put a buy-back clause in there in case he does become a fine player, but I can't see it.
Probably wouldn't want to come back here to be fair.
 
Can anyone genuinely explain to me, bar that he was a bad egg for which there's no evidence, why we wouldn't loan him out instead of selling for peanuts?
The only thing I can think of is if we really are in danger of breaching spending rules, is that homegrown players being sold helps that massively, at least in the PL. I'm guessing the rules in this division are similar. A loan presumably didn't help us in the same way.
 
Can anyone genuinely explain to me, bar that he was a bad egg for which there's no evidence, why we wouldn't loan him out instead of selling for peanuts?

Because not for the first time we've indulged a manager who clearly isn't up to the job.
 
The only thing I can think of is if we really are in danger of breaching spending rules, is that homegrown players being sold helps that massively, at least in the PL. I'm guessing the rules in this division are similar. A loan presumably didn't help us in the same way.
Could make sense but the paltry 200k or less that we had would really mean we're in the shit!
 
To be the kind of midfielder he is, and to still be playing regularly at 39 is a hell of an achievement. His levels of fitness must be staggering.
To think that we weren't bothered when we went up that he signed for Bolton as he hadn't had the best of seasons when he'd be a standout in this team now. Captain, MVP and the head of the Quorum.
 

Members online

Back
Top