DuffleCoat
First Team Player
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2023
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 0
Londonlisa2001 said:We really have not.
We’ve sold Obafemi remember. That was c.£3.5m ish and Whittaker for a million ish and Lati for half a million.
We’ve signed the Ukrainian, Key, Ginelly (who was free) and Yates. Plus we’ve generated more from Martin et al than from getting in Duff et al, and we’ve got rid of Manning and Ntcham (hopefully once the negotiations are complete) who were two of our top earners. And shipped out a few otters as well.
I’m not complaining - it’s utterly sensible, but let’s not pretend we’ve suddenly been spending money from equity investments.
If we sell Piroe or Grimes that will then plug a gap in our operating expenditure by generating player trading profits. Which is why we should do it.
Now if we sign Piroe to a new deal and keep him until January or next summer, the equity investments will mean we don’t need to worry too much about day to day cash flows as we’re effectively subsiding an advance on future sale from money received into the club now rather than having to take a loan until we sell him. But that’s not happened as yet.
Agree to disagree then, I see a potential £24m shortfall needing to be serviced as an extremely big elephant in the room.
Selling players would go to that without any investment. These investments have allowed that debt to be serviced by player sales as well as supplementing the incoming players not just now but for a few windows to come no doubt.
To ignore the loss and to count the sales
vs purchases isn’t giving a true representation of the use of funds and our ability to do work in the transfer market with or without it.