• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Cardiff apply for a loan

  • Thread starter Thread starter PSumbler
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 34
  • Views Views: Views 9,512
PSumbler said:
AceJack said:
Why does it suit Tans narrative to have the supporters and the public believe the club are making a 3 mill a month loss when that isn't the case?

I meant more it suits the narrative of the media to have people believe that

And if Tan gets them believing it then expectations are set about future spending?

Oh I get you.
 
AceJack said:
PSumbler said:
I meant more it suits the narrative of the media to have people believe that

And if Tan gets them believing it then expectations are set about future spending?

Oh I get you.

I don't get it fully though as it was clear from the meeting notes that it was flawed in not including income

Instinctively it tells you something is being buried and hidden somewhere - that will come out in the wash.
 
PSumbler said:
AceJack said:
Oh I get you.

I don't get it fully though as it was clear from the meeting notes that it was flawed in not including income

Instinctively it tells you something is being buried and hidden somewhere - that will come out in the wash.

they are forever kicking cans down the road. Amazed they are still in court dealing with Langstone.
 
PSumbler said:
AceJack said:
Oh I get you.

I don't get it fully though as it was clear from the meeting notes that it was flawed in not including income

Instinctively it tells you something is being buried and hidden somewhere - that will come out in the wash.

My money is on the parachute being used to repay Tan his debt. No way did he turn down a 'good' offer to sell that shower of shit.
 
In fact the more I think about the guff that came out if Dalmans mouth there is no way Tan received a decent offer and turned it down, then on the other hand states we are losing 3 million a month ( on a £30 million pa wage bill :lol: :lol: ) without mentioning the 40 million we’ve had from Tv deals etc....if it was so bad running the club he would have sold up

PSumbler said:
AceJack said:
Why does it suit Tans narrative to have the supporters and the public believe the club are making a 3 mill a month loss when that isn't the case?

I meant more it suits the narrative of the media to have people believe that

And if Tan gets them believing it then expectations are set about future spending?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top