CurtessECarr
Tommy Hutchison
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
- Messages
- 1,355
- Reaction score
- 102
Didn't get up til 8am looks like i've missed the start of England's build up to the big game. Or did it start last night?
Captain_Sham said:That England team doesnt really look that good. In fact it looks shat. How are they so highly rated?
Captain_Sham said:That England team doesnt really look that good. In fact it looks shat. How are they so highly rated?
JackSomething said:Captain_Sham said:That England team doesnt really look that good. In fact it looks shat. How are they so highly rated?
Is it just me or is it a starting 11 full of defenders? 5 actual defenders and 2 defensive midfielders, meaning all the creative and attacking burden is placed on just 3 players?
Saka looks good but is young and inexperienced, Kane has been s**t so far and then there's Sterling, who I really like but who is as likely to do something s**t as he is something amazing.
I'd be very surprised if we have another 3-3 here. Southgate is going to 1-0 them to the final isn't he?
karnataka said:There have been some great games in this round of 16 but don't think this one will be added to the list. Unless both teams are transformed at half time like France were last night.
Resolvenjack said:I reckon Phillips is a lucky boy to only get a yellow for that challenge just before 'King Harry' messed up
Resolvenjack said:I reckon Phillips is a lucky boy to only get a yellow for that challenge just before 'King Harry' messed up
Itchysphincter said:I think England have looked the better side so far. Germany probably more likely to score but they are a typical Germany side, they can probably pick England off with relative ease in the second half if they decide to step it up, but so far they haven’t. Shearer has got a cheek highlighting Kane’s poor performance - he has no service and Shearer had a terrible run before Euro 96 so he should know what it’s like.