• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Finances

Sorry to put a downer on things, but is it just me that's concerned about our Finances? We only escaped breaching P & S regulations this season thanks to the allowable deductions of the academy, women's team and infrastructure costs. We posted a modest profit on player trading of about £4.5 million if my memory serves and yet still posted a hefty loss of over £15 million. The way things are looking at the moment it's hard to see how we can avoid making a loss on player trading, unless there's an unexpected windfall.

With the sell-on fees for Piroe, Whittaker and Joseph added to the fee for Grimes' sale we've made in the region of around £7 million. You can probably deduct a couple of million from this for compensation to Williams and his assistants, plus a likely sizeable loan fee for O'Brien. So we have about £5 million to play with. I'm guessing that Inoussa's £5 million fee is probably around £3 million up front. So that leaves just about £2 million to play with for multiple acquisitions, just to break even.

We may get a million, perhaps a million and a half for Yates, but apart from that who else might we sell? There's been rumours about Vipotnik attracting interest, and he may leave for around £3 million. The only possible big money sale to an established Premier League side would be Eom, and who knows, Inoussa's arrival may be connected to Eom's impending departure. If he went to an established PL side we'd be looking at at least £10 million.

Realistically, if we're to make even a modest profit on player trading this summer we will need at least one big ticket sale. Apart from Eom (and I don't think that's likely) I can't see any other departures generating significant revenue. But the owners are well aware of the P & S constraints - so this has to figure heavily in their thinking. One hopes.
Hey mate - I HOPE that part of the answer is in the salary savings of the dearly departed. - Darling O'Brien Naughton Allen Pederson McLaughlin Christie Tjoe A On (maybe add in Yates Kuharevych Bianchini and others) this might be (Totally a fracking guess) around 80-90 grand a week - or a million every 2-3 months..
Need to fill our squad up with academy products buddy and save our cash for some real difference makers
 
I'm surprised we couldn't do any better commercially than a coffee chain as our main sponsor.

Surely with the Modric effect we could attract a higher profile sponsor with more incoming investment
 
Apparently the total cost of Widell, Inoussa and Wales so far is 1.2m assuming a 300k tribunal award for Walsh

So Inoussa 500k now, Widell 400k in January and Wales tribunal fee.

Not sure when our financial year ends but that's the hit from the first 3.

Obviously the hit in next years finances will be higher e.g. installment payment on Inoussa probably 1m/year plus Widell and any other signings.

All are being brought in on low wages.

The next financial year will have savings on the wage bill by shipping out, sold, or loaned out, players that were in jackarame's post amounting to savings of approx 6m/year. Plus any transfer fees

We also have 3 or 5m, depending on who you believe from Modric's investment. Which gives us that more room too

That appears to be the way this is being made to work
 
Last edited:
It's basically the Chelsea method. Spread the cost of the signings over a longer contract period. Hence the five year deal for Inoussa.

Smart for PSR purposes, risky in that you'll end up carrying a lot of debt on the books, and have a player who might not work out on a long contract.
 

Release of the 2025/26 Fixtures

Online statistics

Members online
54
Guests online
633
Total visitors
687

Forum statistics

Threads
23,193
Messages
314,542
Members
4,782
Back
Top