Londonlisa2001
Tommy Hutchison
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2020
- Messages
- 1,145
- Reaction score
- 38
Ebo said:karnataka said:I'm sorry, but I have to fundamentally disagree with just about everything you've said there.
In my opinion, there is absolutely no reason why we shouldn't keep going through these elections voting for anyone to keep the Tory out. and that is precisely what I hope a huge percentage of the electorate will do next time.
However, it is clear the political landscape has changed over the past couple of decades and the rise of the SNP taking getting on for 40 formerly Labour seats North of the border has probably ensured that Labour will never again be able to get an overall majority but provided the Tories don't, then change to the electoral system can and must happen. It will take Labour to realise their days with an overall majority in the house have gone but if they do and Labour, SNP & Lib Dems and others significantly outnumber the Tories in Westminster, the next step has to be to replace FPTP with PR and drag the UK up from its current archaic system of misgovernment to something approaching that of Sweden and many other progressive societies.
So, when you say Change won't happen overnight, but it'll never happen if we keep voting for anyone but Tory., I 100% disagree with the 2nd part of that sentence because, at the moment, I can't see any other process that can put us on the route to electoral change in this country.
The only way Wales will get the government it wants and never a Tory one is through independence. Otherwise it’ll be the same old s**t every few years.
In other news, Starmer has worked out what a woman is. Pathetic attempt to bury bad news
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/jul/27/starmer-calls-for-a-bank-holiday-if-england-win-womens-euro-2022-final?CMP=fb_gu&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2CamB1QaYRfi8_dkt1nM3sul-gOhQC34NVymnveQuQiLsKElm53X85rqM#Echobox=1658994083
How on Earth does that article have anything to do with Starmer ‘knowing what a woman is’?
The problem is Ebo that people with your views are exactly why we have Johnson and will shortly have Truss. ‘If we can’t have Corbyn we want to burn the country’. It’s absolutely pathetic, it really is.
Momentum have lost control of the Labour Party, and are chucking their toys out of the pram and attempting to undermine Starmer at every single turn.
If you are a supporter, or even a rank and file member, believe what you want and support what you want. But if you are a front bencher, and the leader of the party (who has been elected by that party btw) says not to do something, you don’t bloody do it. If you feel strongly that it’s wrong, you resign from your position and give something up yourself rather than undermine the leader. It’s exactly the sort of ill-disciplined, self serving ‘me, me, me’ petulant nonsense that defines the hard left of the party and has led to successive Tory governments.
Starmer was forced to sack him - it was exactly what Sam Tarry was looking for. As he’s been roundly criticised by his local party for being sodding useless (plus other allegations) and this gives him some sort of National standing.
He’s not doing it in ‘solidarity’ he’s doing it to try to rescue his career. The very behaviour that the ‘far left’ say they despise. And he hasn’t been sacked for standing on a picket line, he’s been sacked for throwing his leader, his colleagues and his party under a bus to save his own skin and for making up policy on the hoof.
On the subject of the strikes themselves, I have mixed views. I completely support the safety aspects of the issue. It’s really a front for pay though. And they get paid a lot. There are other public sector workers who are far more badly treated than them and they’ve now been prevented from getting to their work on a few occasions. It’s not quite as simple as ‘rail companies make x therefore staff need a rise’. The rail companies also take the risk, not the staff. The whole system is a shambles and needs overhauling. You can’t have part of it nationalised and part privatised and all sorts of private companies involved. I would personally have the whole lot in state ownership run by a somewhat independent and devolved authority so it doesn’t become yet another party political pawn but which recognises the importance of the rail infrastructure to our economy. We could also then have sensible price structures not the unbelievable rip offs that we have now.
But that’s a separate matter. Ebo. If you genuinely think Starmer is the same as Truss you shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near a polling booth.