• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Martin. Yes or No?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ARQS
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 110
  • Views Views: Views 2,500

Martin, yes or no?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Hell No

  • Hell Yes


Results are only viewable after voting.
People keep banging on about that run in like it was somehow a vindication of Martin's processes instead of the final damning proof that they didn't work.

We changed from what he was trying to do and played a way that people had been begging for for months and we immediately looked like a better side.

No fucking about at the back. Players in their right positions. A proper defensive four. Ntcham in the middle instead of out wide. Everything he'd done his best to avoid for the two years previously.

He had the tools to get to the playoffs. He failed miserably to do so, and blamed anyone and anything but himself.
 
People keep banging on about that run in like it was somehow a vindication of Martin's processes instead of the final damning proof that they didn't work.

We changed from what he was trying to do and played a way that people had been begging for for months and we immediately looked like a better side.

No fucking about at the back. Players in their right positions. A proper defensive four. Ntcham in the middle instead of out wide. Everything he'd done his best to avoid for the two years previously.

He had the tools to get to the playoffs. He failed miserably to do so, and blamed anyone and anything but himself.
Cheers mate for defining progresss for me , saved me the trouble👍
 
People keep banging on about that run in like it was somehow a vindication of Martin's processes instead of the final damning proof that they didn't work.

We changed from what he was trying to do and played a way that people had been begging for for months and we immediately looked like a better side.

No fucking about at the back. Players in their right positions. A proper defensive four. Ntcham in the middle instead of out wide. Everything he'd done his best to avoid for the two years previously.

He had the tools to get to the playoffs. He failed miserably to do so, and blamed anyone and anything but himself.
It's only the odd fanatic on here. The majority of sane people have seen straight through him. That includes every club he's graced with his managerial brilliance.
 
Cheers mate for defining progresss for me , saved me the trouble👍

And he went to Southampton and Rangers and did all the stupid shit again.

I think that's why, despite serious competition, he's a contender for worst Swansea manager of my lifetime.

All along he knew how to get the team playing better. He just refused to out of sheer arrogance and a need to prove himself right.
 
Take it a step further back and lets use those sharp analytical brains to work through the run of what was it one win in twenty odd games?

It worked out overall as a pretty average season overall, but we actually started and ended really well and had a completely shite run in the middle of it (no idea how he avoided getting sacked after we'd taken 16 points from 21 games in mid-March).

First 16 games - W8 D3 L5 (1.69 ppg)
Next 21 games - W3 D7 L11 (0.76 ppg)
Last 9 games - W7 D2 L0 (2.56 ppg)
 
I’ll tell you one thing…I don’t get to as many games as I used to ( every home and many away) due to my hectic schedule, commuting back and forth to Rio isn’t as glamorous as it sounds, but one thing I never did was threaten to never go back to Vetch or the Liberty as a result of a managerial appointment or a group of players.
 
Would he do better with a bigger budget than last time he was here?
I think it would help, you need a certain level of quality to play the way he does. Having said that, some argue that he still underperformed with Southampton and their squad was worth much more than anything we’d be able to offer even now. I haven’t taken a look back at that Southampton squad but I do remember that season being particularly competitive at the top. 21 games unbeaten is a decent achievement in any league to be fair to him.

The last 10 games or so of his second season we were much better and it’s arguably the best we’ve played over that amount of games since being relegated.

I still wouldn’t reappoint him, I think it’s too risky given where we are and I don’t think we suit his style at the moment.
 
It worked out overall as a pretty average season overall, but we actually started and ended really well and had a completely shite run in the middle of it (no idea how he avoided getting sacked after we'd taken 16 points from 21 games in mid-March).

First 16 games - W8 D3 L5 (1.69 ppg)
Next 21 games - W3 D7 L11 (0.76 ppg)
Last 9 games - W7 D2 L0 (2.56 ppg)
He seemed to escape any criticism whatsoever, which is odd.

His brand of football bored the life out of me to the point I stopped going to games.
 
I’ll tell you one thing…I don’t get to as many games as I used to ( every home and many away) due to my hectic schedule, commuting back and forth to Rio isn’t as glamorous as it sounds, but one thing I never did was threaten to never go back to Vetch or the Liberty as a result of a managerial appointment or a group of players.
I'll tell you one thing...I do get to as many games as I used to (every home and a few away) due to my not very hectic schedule, commuting back and forth 1 mile in Llanelli is as glamorous as it sounds (not very😁) and 1 thing I've never done is threaten to never go back to Vetch field or the Swansea.com as a result of a managerial appointment or a group of players.
However, if they bring back a manager that was so poor the first time around I nearly died of boredom, they have got fuck all chance of me throwing money at them for that pile of shite again.
 

Bristol City v Swansea City

Back
Top