Cinio Dydd Sul
Mel Nurse
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2020
- Messages
- 2,240
- Reaction score
- 201
It won't be Colemans call ultimately.
Is he moving aside?
It won't be Colemans call ultimately.
Who's call will it be then?
There was some rumours kicking about non manager related, don’t know if it’s to do with Coleman but might explain the fans forum and his silence lately.Is he moving aside?
The club’s last three appointments have been RM, MD, and LW. I’d argue all three were failures. Quite frankly, I don’t really care who the club believes is the “right long term solution.”No, I don’t believe it is.
This is a long term decision for our future and it shouldn’t be based on short term factors.
If Sheehan was the right long term person for the job, he’d have been appointed as the manager. He wasn’t. Nor was he last time. So the club don’t believe him to be the right long term solution and fans getting ahead of themselves on the basis of a few matches should play no part in the decision. It’s giving Coleman a cheap opt out.
Whether the club is able to appoint the right long term solution is a completely different question.
Sheehan has done an excellent job at getting us safe which is what he was tasked to do.
Nothing I’ve said detracts from that.
Added: I meant to point out that the last time we made a decision like this we appointed Monk as manager. And that was the decision that ultimately led to our subsequent collapse irrespective of our results in that first season. That’s the difference between short term and long term decisions being good ones.