• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Pedestrian Jailed For Manslaughter

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack123
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 24
  • Views Views: Views 1,351
jack123 said:
When I said the cyclist was incorrect, I said it out of a safety perspective, like I was thinking the cyclist should have been on the inside of the footpath, rather than near to the road, although I have just watched the video of what happened on Wales Online, and it looks like both the pedestrian and cyclist chose the middle of the footpath.

It's such an unnecessary death, which I can only hazard a guess, was caused by both the cyclist and pedestrian, not giving way to one another, like if it was me and saw a cyclist heading towards me, I would move, also if I was a cyclist I would slow down and let the pedestrian pass.

I note in the case, they say it's a shared, but I think it's an unwritten rule that a cyclist would give way to a pedestrian?

The highway code hierarchy of road users gives the pedestrian the most protections, insomuch that a cyclist, next in the chain should give way to the pedestrian.
 
The problem is these days, local authorities are trying to shoe horn these cycle paths on existing highways, given the budgets available it is difficult to achieve. I would argue that if it's not up to standard, the scheme should never go be given the go ahead.
As to this case its absolutely tragic. We all have a responsibility as road users to look out for each other.
 
Jack2jack said:
Bit strange that, it's either an SUP or not. If it was an SUP, there would have to be signage and markings on the footway, warning peds and cyclists. Odd.

What’s an SUP?
 
exiledclaseboy said:
They were called pavements when I was a lad. :D
Its gone all technical dont you know. I would bore you with all the detail, but its sunday, and I dont get payed for weekends. 😉
 
Jack2jack said:
I'm not being funny here, and I dont know the exact layout where the incident happened, but 2.4m is not wide enough for a SUP.

That's a good point, I was curious about this after watching the video, seeing how narrow the footpath was, and after a google it says the minimum width of a SUP should be 3 metres, where the accident occurred it was 2.4 metres. Though I would have thought, the defence would have picked up on that, that the width of the footpath was just an accident waiting to happen.

There's a link here about SUP, although I'm not sure if this is just guidance, rather than law.

https://narrowboatworld.com/11726-minimum-widths-for-combined-cycle-and-pedestrian-routes#:~:text=The%20minimum%20required%20width%20for,pedestrian%20path%20is%203%20metres.
 
Thanks for the link, however, we use our own specific guidance etc. I have looked at the site on google maps.
I wont comment further on the detail of this, it would be un professional of me.
It's an awful, tragic case.
 
Jack2jack said:
Thanks for the link, however, we use our own specific guidance etc. I have looked at the site on google maps.
I wont comment further on the detail of this, it would be un professional of me.
It's an awful, tragic case.

I suppose, ultimately the blame or partial blame for this happening has to
go to the ones who proposed this footpath being an SUP in the first place, thinking about this any proposal of an SUP on such a footpath so narrow is ludicrous once you factor the human element into it.

The human element is a mad thing, I was thinking earlier, I was down Singleton Hospital a while back, and after picking up a prescription from the pharmacy, I was walking back towards the main entrance, along the really narrow corridor, (where there is only room for 2 people) next thing these 2 bloody idiots enter the corridor from the main entrance, and they are walking side by side, I think what do I do pin myself to the wall, or walk backwards, nah I'll just keep walking one of them is bound to move, well they ferking didn't and just walked straight into me, and said ooo as if like where did you come from. Still puzzling me now what it was all about.

The point of that story is, humans are humans and they do the strangest things, so I think something like a SUP should consider the human element as a major factor in decision making.
 

Members online

Back
Top