• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Poor old C*diff

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJack
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 20
  • Views Views: Views 3,960
Risc said:
Why do we need them?

** Edit - I'm not saying I want them to go bust, normal people like all of us rely on their income from the club and wouldn't want to see anyone out of work, but just not sure on how it would impact the Swans.

Six points off our total every year.
 
My tuppence worth.
If the FA, UEFA and FIFA don't come down hard on this situation, then it allows a dangerous precedent.

20 point deduction in place for financial problems/ administration (such as Luton)
I really think that any club, who refuses to pay for a player they have bought, especially when they were claiming they never bought him in the 1st place, has to be a minimum of a transfer embargo and a 40 point deduction.
If our eastern cousins get away with it, imagine what the likes of Yernited, City, Barcelona, PSG Real Madrid with their money would be able to do with this as a precedent
Someone else mentioned a point a day- mmm works as a deterrent and withholding any tv income etc, until the payment is made in full

No one should be allowed to take the p1ss like they have.
 
Ohh dear me :lol:



https://www.westhamzone.com/news/west-ham-united-transfer-embargo-stops-peake-leaving-to-join-cardiff/
 
Swanjaxs said:
Ohh dear me :lol:



https://www.westhamzone.com/news/west-ham-united-transfer-embargo-stops-peake-leaving-to-join-cardiff/

Good enough, how can they expect to sign players when they’re under an embargo.
 
Dewi1jack said:
My tuppence worth.
If the FA, UEFA and FIFA don't come down hard on this situation, then it allows a dangerous precedent.

20 point deduction in place for financial problems/ administration (such as Luton)
I really think that any club, who refuses to pay for a player they have bought, especially when they were claiming they never bought him in the 1st place, has to be a minimum of a transfer embargo and a 40 point deduction.
If our eastern cousins get away with it, imagine what the likes of Yernited, City, Barcelona, PSG Real Madrid with their money would be able to do with this as a precedent
Someone else mentioned a point a day- mmm works as a deterrent and withholding any tv income etc, until the payment is made in full

No one should be allowed to take the p1ss like they have.

I’d be more draconian, I’d maintain the transfer embargo until the debt was settled and if that meant them plummeting through the divisions so be it. I’m not saying that because it’s Cardiff, I’m saying that because there needs to be some order and rules.
 
MajorR said:
I’d be more draconian, I’d maintain the transfer embargo until the debt was settled and if that meant them plummeting through the divisions so be it. I’m not saying that because it’s Cardiff, I’m saying that because there needs to be some order and rules.

Agreed. The fact that it's Cardiff is just a bonus. :D
 

Members online

Back
Top