Most visitors online was 2766 , on 14 Oct 24
A lot of the issues which led to the long ball was no option - I watched Delcroix a number of times just watching when he should have dropped/moved to give the options. It wasn't just Delcroix but he was most guilty. Why we set out as we did against a team of giants who blowdy knows.Vigouroux made 39 passes, 34 of which were long balls. Only 5 of which found a Swansea player. Of the 5 short passes, 4 were completed. Says it all really. Against a team of giants, with Cullen up front that is a totally brain dead tactic. I don't mind taking a horses for courses approach, up to a point. However, the irony here is that a horses for courses approach was to keep the ball down and run rings around the opposition. Same story against Derby.
Yes, there's hell of a lot of positive stuff to offset those games, but it does suggest to me that the Sheehan Way may be as dogmatically long ball - at least from the keeper - as Martin was obsessively about passing it out from the back.
lots of Swans sides would not have stayed as competitive in that atmosphere. Unlucky to not get a point. Enjoyable dayGood effort, great support, Vipotnik should have started. Millwall were effective carthorses.
You're rightVip Almost could be his name. Almost on the end of crosses, almost reaches set pieces, almost finds the target, almost gets a shot off
He is our best number 9 by some distance though. And I thought Gyokeres was crap when he was with us, so I’ve not given up on the lad yet. There’s a hint of something there.
Poor assessment, by your standards.We deserved a point out of that game, but can’t argue too much as we didn’t look like scoring despite creating some excellent chances. VP did himself no favors when he came on. Cooper trying an overhead kick when he could have just laid the ball off - come on son, have some self awareness.
And Bianchini has had way too many offisides due to being lazy and not keeping up with the last line that he can fuxk off back to France and play for laughs over there instead.
Plenty of positives to take from the 2nd half though. Overall, more good evidence for where we need to strengthen in the summer.
Poor assessment, by your standards.
Bianchini needs a proper run in his favored position - wide left cutting in.
Sheezy has so much to learn, and today shone the lights brightly on his glass ceiling
Is his ceiling an average of just under 2 points a game in near enough half a season?Poor assessment, by your standards.
Bianchini needs a proper run in his favored position - wide left cutting in.
Sheezy has so much to learn, and today shone the lights brightly on his glass ceiling
Quarter of a seasonIs his ceiling an average of just under 2 points a game in near enough half a season?
I’m not convinced that VIP finishes better than Cullen. It’s a low bar admittedly and neither clears it.You can see Sheehan's dilemma with Vip and Cullen
One presses well and links play when deep but very limited as a lone striker
The other doesn't press but can hold the ball up and finishes better
Neither have pace or can dominate a CB
So what can he do...
I don't pay any attention to his posts anymore tbh, I just scroll on by. Now, to him, the fact that I've said that means conclusively that I know absolutely nothing about footballIt is obvious that La Jolla is a troll.
BTW, La Jolla is a coastal suburb of San Diego and is notorious for having the highest density of pretentious muppets in the San Diego area. We are talking about San Diego, so that's a high bar.
I'll leave this here.Poor assessment, by your standards.
Bianchini needs a proper run in his favored position - wide left cutting in.
Sheezy has so much to learn, and today shone the lights brightly on his glass ceiling
I'm not saying anythingIt is obvious that La Jolla is a troll.
BTW, La Jolla is a coastal suburb of San Diego and is notorious for having the highest density of pretentious muppets in the San Diego area. We are talking about San Diego, so that's a high bar.