• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Three at the back?

JackArmy14

Youth Team Apprentice
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
There so many geniuses on here who think the problem is our three at the back formation. Well here's a few counter points.

You think Naughton can play as a centre half in a back four? :roll:

Someone claimed on another post that Bidwell was better in a back four than as a wing back. Disagree. What about those times he'd be at the far post to score from right wing crosses.

If anything I believe Manning is more suitable as a left back in a back four. Look at how bad we've been with him at wing back instead of playing him as a LCB in a back three.

In a nut shell I don't think our problem is the formation. I think it's personnel.

Our centre backs especially is a case of quantity over quality.

We are fucked when it comes to choosing the best RCB. We haven't got anyone other than Naughton who can play the sweeper role for the moment and Manning is the only one I've been impressed with in the LCB position.

Martin does need to bring in players to improve this. But he still doesn't help himself when he picks Joel at left wing back instead of Kyle Joseph.

Nonetheless I'm getting seriously pissed off with the toxic knee jerk idiots on here and at the home games.

Like it or not Martin is the manager so he chooses the team. It was also pretty clear to me that he won't give in and ditch the three at back formation so stop whining.
 

Swansea City v Stoke City

Online statistics

Members online
43
Guests online
866
Total visitors
909

Forum statistics

Threads
18,275
Messages
259,443
Members
4,696
Back
Top