Vipotnik

[Curtis]

Vipotnik looks a really quality striker. Should start every match until he needs a break.

 

[Dillwyn the Dog]

As it happens his expected goal tally this season was 6. Shows he's at least getting the opportunities. Now he's got 3 (all excellent in different ways) he will hopefully be more composed in front of goal.

I'd be happy for Vipotnik to stay, but equally I would be happy for him to leave for £4 million. I'd consider letting him go for less if there are good alternatives available for a cut price, which is unlikely.

That would have been a real bargain now with hindsight eh?

 

[magicdaps10]

There has been signs from day one with Vipotnik. He was only 22 when he joined.

He does seem quite awkward at times but he has a rocket of a shot, good on the air......all signs early on.

He is now starting to show his confidence and his movement, touch and link up play is just now at the top of his game.
If he carries this on then he will be attracting alot of interest in the summer and his value will be high given his age.

 

[Pentyrchjack]

I was another game and saw the tug on his shirt real time and it looked a penalty. Having watched it back on the highlights it was a nailed on penalty and a red card for the Millwall centre back.

On the flip side, thank heavens we didn't sign Langstaff in Fluke's time because he was dreadful again and missed an open goal.

 

[bakajack]

I was another game and saw the tug on his shirt real time and it looked a penalty. Having watched it back on the highlights it was a nailed on penalty and a red card for the Millwall centre back.

On the flip side, thank heavens we didn't sign Langstaff in Fluke's time because he was dreadful again and missed an open goal.

Double jeopardy rule means it would never be a red card except for the likes of intentional handball on the goal line

But yeah every time I watch it I can only think that I would have had no complaints if a penalty was given against us for that, which is usually the safest measure of if a penalty should have been given

 

[JackFish]

Double jeopardy rule means it would never be a red card except for the likes of intentional handball on the goal line

But yeah every time I watch it I can only think that I would have had no complaints if a penalty was given against us for that, which is usually the safest measure of if a penalty should have been given

Haven't seen a replay yet but it's only not a red card if there's an attempt to play the ball. Pulling someone back definitely isn't an attempt to play the ball so still a red card for this one.

 

[Magic_Michu]

He was also already on a yellow card so he would definitely of had a 2nd yellow.

 

[J_B]

Double jeopardy rule means it would never be a red card except for the likes of intentional handball on the goal line

But yeah every time I watch it I can only think that I would have had no complaints if a penalty was given against us for that, which is usually the safest measure of if a penalty should have been given

That’s not the double jeopardy rule at all. If the foul is a genuine attempt to play the ball it’s a penalty and a yellow. If there’s no attempt to play the ball it’s a penalty and a red.

 

[PenlanJack]

That’s not the double jeopardy rule at all. If the foul is a genuine attempt to play the ball it’s a penalty and a yellow. If there’s no attempt to play the ball it’s a penalty and a red.

Yeah, same situation happened in the AC Milan vs Napoli game earlier, he gave the pen and a yellow, VAR intervened and told him to go over to the monitor and then sent Estupinan off.. it was identical to Vipotniks, clear pull back denying a goalscoring opportunity