• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

What’s your take on this pedos sentence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 17
  • Views Views: Views 4,818

Darran

Roger Freestone
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
19,664
Reaction score
2,716
Location
A garage in Canoga Park
Apparently it’s the guidelines.
I’m flabbergasted.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/glenn-beard-newton-swansea-it-19117786.amp?utm_source=facebook%2C%20twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wales_jason&__twitter_impression=true
 
These cvnts always have an excuse. Put him on a regular wing inside, not some nonces jail.
 
Darran said:
Apparently it’s the guidelines.
I’m flabbergasted.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/glenn-beard-newton-swansea-it-19117786.amp?utm_source=facebook%2C%20twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wales_jason&__twitter_impression=true

... "police executed a search warrant at the defendant's Swansea home"


It should have read ... The police executed the cvnt at his Swansea home!!
 
TheLoneRanger said:
Darran said:
Apparently it’s the guidelines.
I’m flabbergasted.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/glenn-beard-newton-swansea-it-19117786.amp?utm_source=facebook%2C%20twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wales_jason&__twitter_impression=true


... "police executed a search warrant at the defendant's Swansea home"


It should have read ... The police executed the cvnt at his Swansea home!!

:lol:
 
If that's a serious question, then I would trust the group of people who had studied the case for several weeks rather than anyone who has clicked on a link and made a decision after 5 seconds.
 
It raises the question , what is and what isn't a victimless crime?

Taking of drugs yourself, where is the actual victim of doing that?

Speeding, where is the actual victim of that?

Unless those result in an actual victim being injured or harmed , and can we identify or name a victim that has been directly harmed, is it really a crime?

It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Sensible, and not emotional replies please, and certainly no Juvenile name calling
 
controversial_jack said:
It raises the question , what is and what isn't a victimless crime?

Taking of drugs yourself, where is the actual victim of doing that?

Speeding, where is the actual victim of that?

Unless those result in an actual victim being injured or harmed , and can we identify or name a victim that has been directly harmed, is it really a crime?

It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Sensible, and not emotional replies please, and certainly no Juvenile name calling

You are perchrockjavk and I claim my five pounds.
 
controversial_jack said:
It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.
 
BLAZE said:
controversial_jack said:
It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.

It's a basic question asked of 16 year olds in any A level Sociology class in the UK. If you don't have the same maturity as those 16 year olds then so be it.
 
The last time I checked I wasn't sitting in an A-Level Sociology class - where the question is used in the extreme to further a point - not to raise a genuine argument for the defence of paedos. Get help.
 
BLAZE said:
controversial_jack said:
It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.

That’s one of the best posts on this young forum,he’s a pathetic twat.
 
BLAZE said:
The last time I checked I wasn't sitting in an A-Level Sociology class - where the question is used in the extreme to further a point - not to raise a genuine argument for the defence of paedos. Get help.

It was a general question about crime. If you can't see that then you are not very intelligent
 
Darran said:
BLAZE said:
Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.

That’s one of the best posts on this young forum,he’s a pathetic twat.
I just knew you wouldn't understand, despite asking the question in the first place.
 
It would be like determining, who is the real criminal, the top drug dealers who push the drugs and enforce their ways with violence , or is the person who smokes his joint or takes some cocaine the criminal?

It's probably a bad analogy as child sex is so emotive, and yes, we know it's evil, disgusting and perverted, but who is the real criminal?
 
The real criminal is the asshole that makes the movie or takes the image and then posts his or her sickening content on the web. Downloaders are still however deeply complicit as the consumers of the crime and encourage it's creation.

A substantial custodial sentence for this rimjob, in my estimation, is the minimum he should expect.
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top