• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

What’s your take on this pedos sentence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darran
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 17
  • Views Views: Views 4,454

Darran

Roger Freestone
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
17,722
Reaction score
1,542
Location
A garage in Canoga Park
Apparently it’s the guidelines.
I’m flabbergasted.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/glenn-beard-newton-swansea-it-19117786.amp?utm_source=facebook%2C%20twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wales_jason&__twitter_impression=true
 
These cvnts always have an excuse. Put him on a regular wing inside, not some nonces jail.
 
Darran said:
Apparently it’s the guidelines.
I’m flabbergasted.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/glenn-beard-newton-swansea-it-19117786.amp?utm_source=facebook%2C%20twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wales_jason&__twitter_impression=true

... "police executed a search warrant at the defendant's Swansea home"


It should have read ... The police executed the cvnt at his Swansea home!!
 
TheLoneRanger said:
Darran said:
Apparently it’s the guidelines.
I’m flabbergasted.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/glenn-beard-newton-swansea-it-19117786.amp?utm_source=facebook%2C%20twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wales_jason&__twitter_impression=true


... "police executed a search warrant at the defendant's Swansea home"


It should have read ... The police executed the cvnt at his Swansea home!!

:lol:
 
If that's a serious question, then I would trust the group of people who had studied the case for several weeks rather than anyone who has clicked on a link and made a decision after 5 seconds.
 
It raises the question , what is and what isn't a victimless crime?

Taking of drugs yourself, where is the actual victim of doing that?

Speeding, where is the actual victim of that?

Unless those result in an actual victim being injured or harmed , and can we identify or name a victim that has been directly harmed, is it really a crime?

It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Sensible, and not emotional replies please, and certainly no Juvenile name calling
 
controversial_jack said:
It raises the question , what is and what isn't a victimless crime?

Taking of drugs yourself, where is the actual victim of doing that?

Speeding, where is the actual victim of that?

Unless those result in an actual victim being injured or harmed , and can we identify or name a victim that has been directly harmed, is it really a crime?

It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Sensible, and not emotional replies please, and certainly no Juvenile name calling

You are perchrockjavk and I claim my five pounds.
 
controversial_jack said:
It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.
 
BLAZE said:
controversial_jack said:
It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.

It's a basic question asked of 16 year olds in any A level Sociology class in the UK. If you don't have the same maturity as those 16 year olds then so be it.
 
The last time I checked I wasn't sitting in an A-Level Sociology class - where the question is used in the extreme to further a point - not to raise a genuine argument for the defence of paedos. Get help.
 
BLAZE said:
controversial_jack said:
It's certainly deviant behaviour as is watching dodgy films, but is it an actual crime?

Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.

That’s one of the best posts on this young forum,he’s a pathetic twat.
 
BLAZE said:
The last time I checked I wasn't sitting in an A-Level Sociology class - where the question is used in the extreme to further a point - not to raise a genuine argument for the defence of paedos. Get help.

It was a general question about crime. If you can't see that then you are not very intelligent
 
Darran said:
BLAZE said:
Are you really equating the collection of 80,000 pornographic pictures of children to someone who enjoys watching the odd blue movie?

The victim is quite obviously the child who has been abused for the sexual gratification of sleazy men the world over. It doesnt matter if the victim is known or not known. Attempting to twist a situation like this to further your freeman of the land type bullshit is disgusting.

That’s one of the best posts on this young forum,he’s a pathetic twat.
I just knew you wouldn't understand, despite asking the question in the first place.
 
It would be like determining, who is the real criminal, the top drug dealers who push the drugs and enforce their ways with violence , or is the person who smokes his joint or takes some cocaine the criminal?

It's probably a bad analogy as child sex is so emotive, and yes, we know it's evil, disgusting and perverted, but who is the real criminal?
 
The real criminal is the asshole that makes the movie or takes the image and then posts his or her sickening content on the web. Downloaders are still however deeply complicit as the consumers of the crime and encourage it's creation.

A substantial custodial sentence for this rimjob, in my estimation, is the minimum he should expect.
 

Birmingham City 🏈 v Swansea City 🦢

Back
Top