• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Woodman

  • Thread starter Thread starter Risc
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 18
  • Views Views: Views 5,589
What was noticeable after his injury was how much quicker and more accurately Mulder distributed the ball. I think the made a huge difference to our outfield play.
 
Risc said:
MrSwerve said:
I really want to support Woodman as I have, for the most part, for the last year or so. He does seem to have regressed at an alarming rate since his first few months with us. Hopefully we can put a stable defensive partnership infront of him this season.

It’s good that he’s loved his time here etc, and I would have welcomed him back with open arms if it was a permanent signing as he’s a pup and can hopefully grow into a good keeper in time, but for us to have loaned him to make the same mistakes over and over grates my gears big time when we have Benda sat around doing nothing.

We looked better with Mulder last season imo.

Very disappointed with Mulder in the end. They get their chance and fail to grasp the opportunity. It happened since we lost Fabianski. Woodman is much higher quality keeper but needs to buck up his ideas if he is to progress.
 
Itchysphincter said:
Risc said:
It’s good that he’s loved his time here etc, and I would have welcomed him back with open arms if it was a permanent signing as he’s a pup and can hopefully grow into a good keeper in time, but for us to have loaned him to make the same mistakes over and over grates my gears big time when we have Benda sat around doing nothing.

We looked better with Mulder last season imo.

Very disappointed with Mulder in the end. They get their chance and fail to grasp the opportunity. It happened since we lost Fabianski. Woodman is much higher quality keeper but needs to buck up his ideas if he is to progress.

Woodman's shot stopping was better than Mulder, but he was petrified of the high ball and his distribution is awful. About halfway through the season his confidence was shot to bits and his shot stopping even struggled, one goal that sticks in my head is the Luton goal at our place, it goes through him.

He's a young keeper and they pretty much all go through times like this, he has all of the tools to become a good keeper but the way I see it he is being allowed to make his mistakes here while we have our own keepers we could be progressing. You could argue Margetson's opinion on our keepers is superior to an average joe on the street like myself, but I can't be convinced his job with the England National Team didn't have a big part to play in getting Woodman games down here.
 
Badlands said:
What was noticeable after his injury was how much quicker and more accurately Mulder distributed the ball. I think the made a huge difference to our outfield play.

Despite his shortcomings, his distribution played a big part in out upturn in form after the mid season break.
 

Members online

Back
Top