Most visitors online was 2766 , on 14 Oct 24
This model of loaning players has failed.Why do we waste so much on crappy loan players rather than using our own? Sagoe ffs, what was the point of that? Humphreys? Bloody Ashby was shit from the start.
If we’re both on the same wavelength money wise, I’d give Naughton another year.Never going to achieve anything with any of those out of contract players. The only reason I'd want to keep Allen is because my heart would rule my brain.
Rushworth is going to be an England international if he carries on at this rate. As much as I would like to see him stay, it may make more sense to find our own Rushworth on a permanent basis.
Key could make the step up, Ashby couldn’t make the step down.Why do we waste so much on crappy loan players rather than using our own? Sagoe ffs, what was the point of that? Humphreys? Bloody Ashby was shit from the start.
I'm hoping the owners have some ambition and are looking to replace with better. If not then I can see an argument for Naughton and Paterson.If we’re both on the same wavelength money wise, I’d give Naughton another year.
We could play him anywhere outfield and he’ll give you an almost certain 7/10.
Similar with Pato but with Walsh and Allen, we simply aren’t getting our monies worth unfortunately. Time to move on there.
Well we know the reason why humpreys/ashby were bought in as we were playing 5 at the back and duff wanted 2 players in each position. No one was complaining when they were bought in as they were seen by many as promising players with bright futures. Not sure blame can be laid at anyones door there.Why do we waste so much on crappy loan players rather than using our own? Sagoe ffs, what was the point of that? Humphreys? Bloody Ashby was shit from the start.
Agree with all of that. When Duff came in he would have said how he wanted to play and it would have been Coleman's and Watson's collective responsibility to bring in players to cater to his formation.Well we know the reason why humpreys/ashby were bought in as we were playing 5 at the back and duff wanted 2 players in each position. No one was complaining when they were bought in as they were seen by many as promising players with bright futures. Not sure blame can be laid at anyones door there.
I might have felt a bit sorry for Duff too, if it wasn't for the fact he:Agree with all of that. When Duff came in he would have said how he wanted to play and it would have been Coleman's and Watson's collective responsibility to bring in players to cater to his formation.
One of the best things that Williams did was ditching the back 3 idea after 4 or 5 games when it became clear we simply do not have the personnel for it. A consequence of that is that many of the players brought in to the club on loan became unnecessary, unfortunately it was way too late in the window by then for us to do anything about it.
While Duff was absolutely the wrong fit for us I do also have to feel a little sorry for him, a number of the players brought in for him suffered serious mid to long term injuries very early on. Ginnelly is the obvious one, he picked up a knock in preseason that delayed him getting up to full sharpness and the game where it all clicked for him he was kicked off the park and ended up with a season ending injury after barely two months of the season.
Key similarly suffered a mid term injury as did Allen, Walsh, (allegedly) Kukharevych, Ashby, Patino to name just a few. He was never able to field a full strength settled side and so whatever his tactical game plan was we were never able to see it. We had to make do with hopeful aimless long ball strategies with no player physically suited to that style of play.
I'm not saying that I am disappointed he is gone, it was apparent fairly soon into his tenure that he wasn't the right fit for us. Doesn't mean that he wouldn't have semi valid reasons for why we didn't perform, it wasn't only about tactics (or his lack of it) but his lacking the personnel that he presumably had at least some input even if only on a positional level would have been a fair one.I might have felt a bit sorry for Duff too, if it wasn't for the fact he:
Can't blame the guy for taking the job when offered, but when he got here he didn't help himself at all. Zero sympathy from me - if he'd limped on in to the new year he'd have relegated us.
- Told the fans the derby shouldn't matter, then went and lost the fixture a few days later
- Mocked the club for being stuck in the past with its passing football philosophy
- Spent his first couple of press conferences and interviews denigrating his predecessor (as an etiquette thing, you just don't do it, you smile nicely & play the game)
- Bollocked the players at West Brom for the "crime" of trying to keep the ball when we were getting pasted
- Tried to pass off the draw at QPR as a "win on xG" - embarrassing
- Talked a good game about "front foot, high tempo" then delivered the slowest, most cumbersome mess since Paul Clement's last season
- Refused to put down roots in the area