Homophobes in sport

[jack123]

They are innocent, the management have even apologised to them for putting them in such a position. How can they be homophobic bigots just for refusing to wear a shirt?

If you don’t get it it says everything about you.

But then, you have form…

Answer the question, how can anyone be a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action.

 

[Darran]

They are innocent, the management have even apologised to them for putting them in such a position. How can they be homophobic bigots just for refusing to wear a shirt?

If you don’t get it it says everything about you.

But then, you have form…

The prick recently said that they’ll be normalising pedophilia next in response to his opinion that there are too many homosexuals on tv.
He’s a horrible bigoted c*nt who is being given a platform to spout his vile bile.

 

[jack123]

I won't be denying my post.

STOP THE PRESS, man disagrees with londonlisa calling innocent people dickheads.

I didn’t refer to you. I was generalising.

As with the tampon thread, I will never understand why something that has zero effect on a person can make make them so hostile to others, or lead to monumental meltdowns on the internet.

Each to their own I suppose, but life’s too short to be perpetually angered by things that have no negative effect on a single person or thing.

I wasn't being hostile, lisa calls people dickheads, which I think is uncalled for.

 

[jack123]

If you don’t get it it says everything about you.

But then, you have form…

The prick recently said that they’ll be normalising pedophilia next in response to his opinion that there are too many homosexuals on tv.
He’s a horrible bigoted c*nt who is being given a platform to spout his vile bile.

Stick to the topic in hand rather than all this mis-direction. :evil:

 

[Darran]

The prick recently said that they’ll be normalising pedophilia next in response to his opinion that there are too many homosexuals on tv.
He’s a horrible bigoted c*nt who is being given a platform to spout his vile bile.

Stick to the topic in hand rather than all this mis-direction. :evil:

No.

 

[Londonlisa2001]

I didn’t refer to you. I was generalising.

As with the tampon thread, I will never understand why something that has zero effect on a person can make make them so hostile to others, or lead to monumental meltdowns on the internet.

Each to their own I suppose, but life’s too short to be perpetually angered by things that have no negative effect on a single person or thing.

I wasn't being hostile, lisa calls people dickheads, which I think is uncalled for.

I thought it was remarkably restrained. I should have called them bigoted dickheads.

 

[jack123]

If you don’t get it it says everything about you.

But then, you have form…

Answer the question, how can anyone be a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action.

I'm off out now, but I will be interested to know the answer to that question, by anyone.. how can someone be called a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action?

 

[jack123]

Not so quick to reply now are you..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe4qk7Mijlo

 

[Swanjaxs]

Not so quick to reply now are you..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe4qk7Mijlo

WTF!

Get help

 

[Itchysphincter]

I didn’t refer to you. I was generalising.

As with the tampon thread, I will never understand why something that has zero effect on a person can make make them so hostile to others, or lead to monumental meltdowns on the internet.

Each to their own I suppose, but life’s too short to be perpetually angered by things that have no negative effect on a single person or thing.

I wasn't being hostile, lisa calls people dickheads, which I think is uncalled for.

I was generalising.

 

[Itchysphincter]

If you don’t get it it says everything about you.

But then, you have form…

The prick recently said that they’ll be normalising pedophilia next in response to his opinion that there are too many homosexuals on tv.
He’s a horrible bigoted c*nt who is being given a platform to spout his vile bile.

Posts like that shouldn't be deleted though - is there anyway admin could just put a box around the text or add a disclaimer to signify that a post is not representative of our values?

 

[Itchysphincter]

Answer the question, how can anyone be a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action.

I'm off out now, but I will be interested to know the answer to that question, by anyone.. how can someone be called a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action?

Here's another generalisation for you, an answer to your question, and another question:

By 'not performing a certain action' aren't they making a protest or showing their disapproval or displeasure, so by default doing something?

 

[Londonlisa2001]

Answer the question, how can anyone be a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action.

I'm off out now, but I will be interested to know the answer to that question, by anyone.. how can someone be called a homophobic bigot for not performing a certain action?

They didn’t ‘not perform an action’. They very deliberately did perform an action. The inactive response would have been to put on a shirt that everyone else was wearing and they were given by their club. They actively refused to do so and removed themselves from their job. They went on strike in effect.

The reason they are so obviously bigots is because are only pretending to care about the religious justification. They don’t mean it. Because if they did mean it their adherence to religious teaching would be consistently applied. And it’s not. They do not consistently apply the teachings of their church. In fact, they actively go against the teachings of their church for many things. Playing on a Sunday, promoting betting, promoting financial services companies that charge interest etc etc etc. And that’s just stuff directly related to this discussion.
The ONLY thing they are using their religion to hide behind appears to be their opposition to homosexuality. And, again, they are not being told to be homosexual. They are being asked to promote tolerance of those who are. Which their religion tells them to do.

They are bigots. And they are dickheads. And those who support them are also dickheads. As they refuse to acknowledge the ridiculously inconsistent application of the ‘religious’ basis for their actions. Either because they are ill informed, or because they are also bigots. Either way, dickhead is appropriate as a description.

 

[K23]

I didn’t refer to you. I was generalising.

As with the tampon thread, I will never understand why something that has zero effect on a person can make make them so hostile to others, or lead to monumental meltdowns on the internet.

Each to their own I suppose, but life’s too short to be perpetually angered by things that have no negative effect on a single person or thing.

I wasn't being hostile, lisa calls people dickheads, which I think is uncalled for.

Surely it would only be uncalled for if they weren't dickheads, which they clearly are as any sentient lifeform would be able to spot.

 

[JackSomething]

Not so quick to reply now are you..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe4qk7Mijlo

WTF!

Get help

He gave people 4 minutes to reply to his post, then buggered off before anyone had the chance because he knows his post would get destroyed easily, as Lisa has since done.

I'm sure he'll be back later once more intelligent bigoted people have provided him with a counter-argument and he's had a few jars...