Most visitors online was 2766 , on 14 Oct 24
We have two recognised central defenders at the club.I get immensely frustrated when we lowball on bids, but I think there is a slight exception with Low due to his odd contract. The length is supposedly kept private, but there's a general understanding that it's set to expire in 6 months, which does make it a bit of a minefield for bidding. The club will argue that they're better off saving the £800k-£1m in the short term, to offer him a better contract with a lower overall cost in the summer.
Issue with this line of thinking in this exact scenario is that we just need someone to come in at centre-half, and we can't really afford to fanny around.
But but but we've got new American owners, one of them has a Welsh granny and owns the tallest hotel in the world...We have two recognised central defenders at the club.
You'd like to think signing another would be a priority for the club.
The fact both are now injured and we haven't got anyone through the door is an absolute shambles.
Same shit, different day.But but but we've got new American owners, one of them has a Welsh granny and owns the tallest hotel in the world...
isn’t one of them a billionaire and is an apparent swans fan?But but but we've got new American owners, one of them has a Welsh granny and owns the tallest hotel in the world...
Nah, your thinking of Charlie Morgan mun...isn’t one of them a billionaire and is an apparent swans fan?
isn’t one of them a billionaire and is an apparent swans fan?
Maybe Darling is off an allNot in Wycombe squad tonight, was playing on the weekend
Newcastle United are a great example of having a pile of cash and not being allowed to spend it.Being a Billionaire in football doesn't mean an awful lot these days. Still have to meet PSR.
Man United also being bitten by the PSR rules, which disproves the theory that it would allow the rich clubs to close the gates and stop anyone challenging them. Even those that generate huge revenues have to spend them properly.Newcastle United are a great example of having a pile of cash and not being allowed to spend it.
I like the principle of it. Makes the playing field a bit fairer.Man United also being bitten by the PSR rules, which disproves the theory that it would allow the rich clubs to close the gates and stop anyone challenging them. Even those that generate huge revenues have to spend them properly.
Good piece by Rory Smith on the Athletic about it if anyone is a subscriber. He wrote that the PL clubs didn't think it had teeth until both Everton and Forest were deducted points last season.
Well you can say that, but Citeh have spent nia on a billion quid this window with players they've bought with fees and wages etc, think one or two are going there in close season, not 100% on that though.Man United also being bitten by the PSR rules, which disproves the theory that it would allow the rich clubs to close the gates and stop anyone challenging them. Even those that generate huge revenues have to spend them properly.
Good piece by Rory Smith on the Athletic about it if anyone is a subscriber. He wrote that the PL clubs didn't think it had teeth until both Everton and Forest were deducted points last season.
I don't think there'll be anything significant there, the way the "experts" are talking and they Citeh probably couldn't give a fuk anyway.I like the principle of it. Makes the playing field a bit fairer.
Ok going after the likes Everton and Forset. The litmus test will be the outcome of the Man City charges.