Rockin’s topics were a bit generic. We all want to be richer blah blah. To be more precise about it:
1. Strengthen the NHS, but not just by chucking more money at it; there must be radical reform that results in accessibility for everyone.
2. Simplify the taxation system.
3. Reform of the benefits system and state pension (the latter will never happen unfortunately)
4. Implement a skills plan for 16-21 year olds that boosts skilled labour through modern apprenticeship schemes, at same time killing off universities who promote useless degree courses that only line the pockets of the backers.
5. Review or foreign aid policy, use it proactively to reduce the impact that is getting debated on here.
I’m not overly pro independence, I’m yet to see strong financial arguments that justify it.
Not a dig at you, because I agree with you, but everyone loves these words, like motherhood and apple pie. they are in every consultant's report and always lead precisely nowhere. It always ends up in the 'too difficult' box when it comes to actually changing anything, at least, for the better. People always somehow manage to change things for the worse. It's like saying 'sort out the MoD and defence spending efficiency', which has been said since I was at Worthy Down in 1985 and still hasn't happened.
Also, I was one of two folk working at the coal face in the NHS 'Value for Money' unit in the 80s and, when push comes to shove, 70% of spend was on Salaries and Wages (probably 90% now as we had no management layers then). I have a lot of scars. Digressing further down that rabbit hole, the hard truth is, we cannot afford free care at point of use for everyone for everything (probably couldn't in 1987), nor the ridiculous lawsuits as if healthcare carries no risk. That said, we would have had more money if we hadn't participated in stupid US wars, where there always seemed to be enough unlimited money. To add to the impossibility we don't have many doctors and those we do obviously prefer private work. The supply issue imposes serious constraint. My wife's surgery can get neither doctors, nor properly trained nurses.
Anyway, as a start, I would like cross party serious expert analysis and prioritised time driven (I can do consultantspeak) recommendations for the 'reform' you are suggesting for main areas (I would add in public ownership and funding of strategic assets - like water, power, steel, and defence spending as mentioned) that would span multiple parliaments and any change of government, fully costed and fully binding. So, like the non-Cardiff centric WAG I mentioned in another thread...not happening.
Oh, and on "Universities who promote useless degree courses that only line the pockets of the backers." What are these Universities? For what it's worth, I would go back to Universities (Research based and critical thinking), Polytechnics (Highly skilled training allied with critical thinking) and Tech colleges (trades and skills). No hierarchy, just different roles. Making everything a university was, for my money, one of those changes for the worse.