• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Martin. Yes or No?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ARQS
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 81
  • Views Views: Views 1,329

Martin, yes or no?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Hell No

  • Hell Yes


Results are only viewable after voting.
A lot of people boxing themselves in on this thread, here’s some advice….when you walk out the room always leave the door ajar never close it behind you👍
Not really boxing myself in. It’s would take a significant in results for me to change my view, but the appointment of Martin wouldn’t stop me going to footy every other week or so.
 
A lot of people boxing themselves in on this thread, here’s some advice….when you walk out the room always leave the door ajar never close it behind you👍
It's the Internet. It's not serious and nobody boxes themselves in to anything. Players and managers are shit today and heroes tomorrow. It's a pantomime.
 
A lot of people boxing themselves in on this thread, here’s some advice….when you walk out the room always leave the door ajar never close it behind you👍
You're very keen on telling us what's not happening so who are we going to appoint?
 
It's not going to happen.
I don't think we should go back, I don't think he deserves to be considered and not to mention the risk and awkwardness that would come with it.
 
Seriously, it’s not happening but would it be so bad?
The football during those final twelve games under him was superb, he even improved the likes of Cabango, got Southampton promoted under a huge weight of expectation and like many others including Danny Rohl failed at Rangers.
Probably learned from his mistakes, knows the club and is still popular with many, many of you were wetting yourselves at the prospect of a Swedish unknown taking the job!!
 
Of course people were unhappy but many could see that there was some progress and like it or not an identity,, easy to forget goals like we scored at Wigan which for me was right up there with the Fulham clip that was played over and over again when we were in the Premiership.
Tell what wasn't easy to forget were all the goals we conceded under the fella. The two in injury time at home to Millwall were right up there.
 
Seriously, it’s not happening but would it be so bad?
The football during those final twelve games under him was superb, he even improved the likes of Cabango, got Southampton promoted under a huge weight of expectation and like many others including Danny Rohl failed at Rangers.
Probably learned from his mistakes, knows the club and is still popular with many, many of you were wetting yourselves at the prospect of a Swedish unknown taking the job!!
It’s a bit of a stretch to say that Danny Rohl has failed at Rangers.

Martin doesn’t learn from mistakes. You only have to look at the pattern of goals conceded by us and Southampton to see this
 
Of course people were unhappy but many could see that there was some progress and like it or not an identity,, easy to forget goals like we scored at Wigan which for me was right up there with the Fulham clip that was played over and over again when we were in the Premiership.
As was that stimulating nil nil draw with 70% plus possesion away to bottom of the table Middlesboro.....we scired very few goals during his reign....many were a result of Piroes own making
 
It’s a bit of a stretch to say that Danny Rohl has failed at Rangers.

Martin doesn’t learn from mistakes. You only have to look at the pattern of goals conceded by us and Southampton to see this
Rhol needs to fix the car crash that was Martin, who was taking Rangers to a third place finish in a two horse race.
 
NO. I had the misfortune of seeing the most spineless performance in 45 years supporting the Swans away at Stoke. Whilst the Ipswich game was terrible, we did at least try.
 
Seriously, it’s not happening but would it be so bad?
The football during those final twelve games under him was superb, he even improved the likes of Cabango, got Southampton promoted under a huge weight of expectation and like many others including Danny Rohl failed at Rangers.
Probably learned from his mistakes, knows the club and is still popular with many, many of you were wetting yourselves at the prospect of a Swedish unknown taking the job!!
It's obvious he hasn't.
Same mistakes here, at Southampton & Rangers.
Belligerent to a point where he falls out with players, throws them under the bus to save himself and is still arrogant enough to think he's not the problem.
 
Rhol needs to fix the car crash that was Martin, who was taking Rangers to a third place finish in a two horse race.
Martin won one in seven in the SPL for 8 points.
Rohl has played three won three in the SPL for 9 points.

We could use that sort of failure here.
 

Bristol City v Swansea City

Back
Top