exiledclaseboy said:Seems to have worked.
Indeed it has. I rest my case m’lud.
exiledclaseboy said:Seems to have worked.
J_B said:“When I hear you using words against refugees like ‘swarms’ and an ‘invasion’, I am reminded of the language used to dehumanise and justify the murder of my family and millions of others.
Why do you find the need to use that kind of language?”
Not said by Lineker but a holocaust survivor to Braverman who still wouldn't apologise for her choice of words.
MugfordsJack said:You’ve got to hand it to the Conservative ‘machine’ though. They really know which ‘buttons’ to press with the ‘great’ British voting public to get re-elected. They know that at least 20% of them are outright racists and another 20% are Xenophobic and easily manipulated. If they can pull off a reasonable performance in the next election with every facet of British life as awful as it is right now using a Conservative-manufactured human tragedy then, fair play, they’ve played a blinder and we deserve what we get. Although I love the historical growth of the Unions which achieved the ‘democracy’ we enjoy today (opposed by the Conservatives at every step), even I have started to consider the benefits of an IQ based qualification for voting.
Neath_Jack said:And you can see that it works from an example in this thread alone. Frightening, genuinely frightening.
karnataka said:And good on him for refusing to apologise for speaking the truth too. Great to see his comments getting under Braverman's skin.
Why do I always feel a nagging need to dig out my old cricket bat every time I see that vile woman's face?
karnataka said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmSoEH88kHI
karnataka said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmSoEH88kHI
exiledclaseboy said:The government knows it won’t stand of course. This is purely designed so they can say “well we tried but the bloody Europeans and WOKE leftie human rights lawyers stopped us”. And their thick voters will lap it all up.