Most visitors online was 16456 , on 19 Nov 25
Latest activity
-
Darran replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Vote em out Mr T. -
TI still think Sheehan absolutely earnt the right to have a go on a full time basis… maybe not on a 3 year contract tho 🥴
-
LLondonlisa2001 replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.I think some of them very much do give a f**k and some of them don’t. In all parties. Interestingly the person who most doesn’t give a...
-
Martyn - Derwydd replied to the thread Kim Hellberg.pssst shush it might be Jurgen Klopps best man -
exiledclaseboy replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Four years till an election so if he is replaced it’s gonna be with another Labour PM. -
CCopamundial replied to the thread Kim Hellberg.I’ll tell you what was a huge shame….me parting with £28 to watch that rubbish last Saturday, and it won’t be Hellberg.
-
Menston4128 replied to the thread SHEEHAN SACKED.If the new manager can get us playing like that then we will have got it right this time. -
Ronald Parp replied to the thread Kim Hellberg.I didn’t fancy Sheehan much but I was willing to accept that he’d earned his shot at it. What’s a shame is that he blew his opportunity... -
PSumbler replied to the thread Adam Worth.There are many people who have an internet persona on forums that is nothing like they are on the forums mind... Mind you there are... -
FHe was who the owners wanted but felt they couldn’t not give the job to Sheehan… which would have been madness for them not too. But...
-
PPompeyjack replied to the thread Rachel Reeves.Surely putting County before pride should be upmost "living hell for him".
-
FI’ve said before that I understood the reasons for the appointment, although it wouldn’t have been my choice, but I have to say that...
-
There were a couple of goals against West Brom that were world class in what was possibly the greatest 45 minutes I've ever witnessed in...
-
PDon’t think so. Can’t see him lasting past the May locals.
-
PI meant Starmer, Reeves and Lammy