Darran
Roger Freestone

Ipswich reveal captain Sam Morsy chose not to wear rainbow armband
Ipswich’s Sam Morsy was the only Premier League captain not to wear a rainbow armband in support of the LGBTQ+ community at the weekend
Not the same - he has no choice with the shirt. If he wants to play for Ipswich he has to wear the shirt.Shock as hypocrite refuses to support LGBT rights for 'religious reasons', but wears a fat betting sponsor on his top
Almost like he's just homophobic instead of religious
I suspect it’s a requirement to wear kit. He can’t just ruck up and play skins because he doesn’t like a sponsor.Shock as hypocrite refuses to support LGBT rights for 'religious reasons', but wears a fat betting sponsor on his top
Almost like he's just homophobic instead of religious
Absolutely. Otherwise we’re no better than those regimes that silence any opposition. Freedom from discrimination on the grounds of religion (as nutty as they are) is a cornerstone of our democracy.I think people like him who follow a religion that endorses and entrenches homophobia are absolutely bonkers and have a screw loose - but equally I defend to the death his right to follow and practice that religion if he wishes to do so.
Equally he could choose not to sign for a team that has a betting company as a sponsor. Or her could be like those players in France who refused to wear rainbow kits a few years ago (Gueye of Everton was one of them), meaning they didn't play in those games.I suspect it’s a requirement to wear kit. He can’t just ruck up and play skins because he doesn’t like a sponsor.
Innit, but who cares, if I was him I'd wear it, no skin off my nose and if people felt I was supporting them then fine, just wear it you don't have comment on it wear it play the game then take if after the game I don't see an issue myself.That’s his choice innit, he’s entitled to it after all.
Lots of assumptions there. I don’t know the bloke, so don’t feel in a position to speak for him. I imagine it’s pretty hard to avoid betting in football. And who knows whether those sponsors were in place when he signed 2-3 years ago. But, as I say, who knows (and frankly who cares).Equally he could choose not to sign for a team that has a betting company as a sponsor. Or her could be like those players in France who refused to wear rainbow kits a few years ago (Gueye of Everton was one of them), meaning they didn't play in those games.
I absolutely support his decision not to wear the armband, it has to be an individual choice or it's a meaningless gesture. However, by wearing a shirt with a better sponsor he has certainly opened himself up to being called a hypocrite, picking and choosing which aspects of his religion matter to him. Or he could actually be a homophobe, who knows?
James McLean gets hammered for not wearing a poppy, but he's always willing to explain his reasoning when asked about it (as was Matic when playing for Man United). Morsy and Ahmedhodzic of Sheffield United duck the question when asked why they choose not to wear the armband, meaning they're also pretty cowardly.