I beg to differ. Williams' approach was a strange mishmash of turgid slow play out from the back combined with a lot of diagonal long balls from Grimes and Vigouroux to the wingers. Only Coventry delivered more crosses into the box than we did under Williams. Ronald was a big part of that. It's too easy to blame Williams.Williams's game plan also involved recycling the ball perpetually and never risking losing the ball. The difference between Ronald's willingness to attack full backs before and after Williams left is night and day, you don't just recover that instinct and composure instantly after 13 months of it being coached out of you
The harsh truth is that Ronald is more miss than hit when it comes to dribbling and crossing. It's only thanks to his phenomenal work ethic that his overall figures are decent. I doubt whether that will improve much under Sheehan. I'd be happy if he stays, thanks to his overall contribution, but if we get a decent fee I wouldn't mind him leaving either.