• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

S25/26 | The Official Match Thread | Swansea City 0 QPR 1 | Att: 14,254 | 22/10 | The EFL Championship | Swansea.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackharris
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 420
  • Views Views: Views 15,319
Nowhere near good enough with 11 either. Pathetic actually
I would say pathetic, yes there are some improvements to be made, I reckon we'll come good sooner rather than later, all about opinions I know, keep the faith mate.👍
 
Just a mess of a game really. Tried a tweak to the formation but the players looked out of sorts in it. Then the mess of a red card, then we're up against it being man down and swapping players around again. Never really got going. More effort in the 2nd half, but again, just a mess of a night.

Saturday takes on big significance now. Will he try again with the formation change or revert? Will Vip come back in to the team? Can we get a shot on target before the 90th minute.......?
 
Another game to forget.

Positives

1) Widel had a bright cameo. Looks like a midfielder who can get on the turn and has some technical ability. Needs to be an option to at least come off the bench in every game.
2) In Vigs we trust.
3) I do not know if we should play him at right back full time because he is so good in midfield, but Galbraith is some player no matter where he plays. Clone him.

Negatives

1) We still create next to absolutely nothing.
2) Idah looks very rusty. I do not think that Vipotnik is the most mobile striker but he looks miles clear of Idah.
3) They are not terrible players but I am starting to doubt how much our midfield has improved aside from Galbraith.
4) Stamenic looks the part but he does not pass forwards and is very safe in that role. Does he play as the deepest midfielder for New Zealand?
5) Yalcouye should not get chances ahead of Widel. He is not our player and looks pretty limited, adding nothing that the others do not already bring. He can just be an energy sub or out of the squad if everyone is fit.
6) It all feels very inevitable now and it is not if but when and this forum may become a warzone.
 
Are people seriously suggesting that if we beat Norwich we should stick with Sheehan, we’ve been awful to watch all season and we’re not improving.
Why do you think we waited so long to appoint him as the full time manager??? I’ll tell you…because there were probably huge doubts by the people who know football and understand that there’s a massive gap between a caretaker manager who gets a bounce and a full time manager who has to mould a team.
 
Another game to forget.

Positives

1) Widel had a bright cameo. Looks like a midfielder who can get on the turn and has some technical ability. Needs to be an option to at least come off the bench in every game.
2) In Vigs we trust.
3) I do not know if we should play him at right back full time because he is so good in midfield, but Galbraith is some player no matter where he plays. Clone him.

Negatives

1) We still create next to absolutely nothing.
2) Idah looks very rusty. I do not think that Vipotnik is the most mobile striker but he looks miles clear of Idah.
3) They are not terrible players but I am starting to doubt how much our midfield has improved aside from Galbraith.
4) Stamenic looks the part but he does not pass forwards and is very safe in that role. Does he play as the deepest midfielder for New Zealand?
5) Yalcouye should not get chances ahead of Widel. He is not our player and looks pretty limited, adding nothing that the others do not already bring. He can just be an energy sub or out of the squad if everyone is fit.
6) It all feels very inevitable now and it is not if but when and this forum may become a warzone.
Galbraith is better right back than Key, he's also our best midfielder as well 🫣

I thought Widdel looked good as well, got be close to starting the next game based on the performance of others.
 
Frustrating times to be sure, poor performance in truth and a lot of work from Sheehan to turn things around.

Stupid from Yalcouye, but he was looking good before getting sent off.

Stamenic was poor, Key is crap, Idah not offering much as a striker and EOM non exsitent when we went down to 10 men.

Widdell looked lively and needs to play more (and from the start). VIptonik is by far our best striker at the moment.

Biggest issue for me is the lack of creativty and this I feel is down to Sheehan and needs to change soon or it will be his undoing.
 
Are people seriously suggesting that if we beat Norwich we should stick with Sheehan, we’ve been awful to watch all season and we’re not improving.
Why do you think we waited so long to appoint him as the full time manager??? I’ll tell you…because there were probably huge doubts by the people who know football and understand that there’s a massive gap between a caretaker manager who gets a bounce and a full time manager who has to mould a team.
They had to give it to him based on last season. He's now shown that he's not up to it - both in results and general play which is probably the worst I can remember.

They need to spend big on a manager like they did in the squad, not piss around with another process guy
 

Swansea City 🦢 v QPR 🔵⚪

Back
Top