• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

Eduvie Ikoba

magicdaps10 said:
Transfermarkt šŸ˜‚

That site just works off rumours, valuations and transfer fees on there can be way off.

Accurate with this one though.
 
magicdaps10 said:
Transfermarkt šŸ˜‚

That site just works off rumours, valuations and transfer fees on there can be way off.

No it doesnā€™t, if they donā€™t know then they put a ā€œ?ā€ by it like they did with Key.

Their valuations are estimated, their transfer fees are fact.
 
DuffleCoat said:
No it doesnā€™t, if they donā€™t know then they put a ā€œ?ā€ by it like they did with Key.

Their valuations are estimated, their transfer fees are fact.

I was told a fee slightly higher than that. Between that and Yates.

Whatever it is though, itā€™s alot higher than people realise I think, I was shocked by it.
 
Risc said:
I was told a fee slightly higher than that. Between that and Yates.

Whatever it is though, itā€™s alot higher than people realise I think, I was shocked by it.

Same, I think the extra is the total package value.

But as you say, the total fee isnā€™t too far off Yatesā€™. These players arenā€™t cheap.
 
DuffleCoat said:
No it doesnā€™t, if they donā€™t know then they put a ā€œ?ā€ by it like they did with Key.

Their valuations are estimated, their transfer fees are fact.

So we got nothing for Joel Lat and sold Obafemi for 4M.
Shows we paid 2.3M for Darling.

It works off media, press and other outlets for fees etc etc
Site has its uses but for reliability it has a lot to be desired with.

Spend a bit of time looking through it and you can easily find a lot of absolute tosh on there......far from fact.
 
magicdaps10 said:
So we got nothing for Joel Lat and sold Obafemi for 4M.
Shows we paid 2.3M for Darling.

It works off media, press and other outlets for fees etc etc
Site has its uses but for reliability it has a lot to be desired with.

Spend a bit of time looking through it and you can easily find a lot of absolute tosh on there......far from fact.

Show me a media outlet that mentions we signed him for ā‚¬2m then. Or are you suggesting they have come on here to have a look? :lol:

Lati was a tribunal free transfer, I donā€™t think it lists compensation. ā‚¬2.3m euros for Darling is correct yeah as is ā‚¬4m euros for Oba.

Daps, quit when you are behind fella. You are now being told by multiple people.
 
So I take it that Josh Key is as Joel Lat down as free then!

The site is known to not be accurate.
As a previous poster said, you would argue black is blue to save face.
You might have convinced others, you made a statement on spend so you want it to be right......i and others see the motive.
 
magicdaps10 said:
So I take it that Josh Key is as Joel Lat down as free then!

The site is known to not be accurate.
As a previous poster said, you would argue black is blue to save face.
You might have convinced others, you made a statement on spend so you want it to be right......i and others see the motive.

ā€œFreeā€ or ā€œ?ā€ Is perfectly fine as a listing.

It is a free transfer, they donā€™t know the compensation. When they do they will list it.

Surely this is you arguing black is white, no?

Everything points to me being correct, not you. We have Risca who is also telling you and Transfermarkt.

Itā€™s funny as you seemed to agree on SI when you added up we had 6-7m income :lol:

Yeah talk about agendas champ.

I donā€™t ā€œwantā€ anything to be right, I know whatā€™s right. Iā€™m amazed you havenā€™t figured that out yet.
 
magicdaps10 said:
So I take it that Josh Key is as Joel Lat down as free then!

The site is known to not be accurate.
As a previous poster said, you would argue black is blue to save face.
You might have convinced others, you made a statement on spend so you want it to be right......i and others see the motive.

No one has had to convince me daps. I just know on this occasion the fee is alot higher than you are stating.

Majority of the time Iā€™m just speculating like everyone else, but this particular one, nope.
 
Iā€™m sure he knows now, bless him. Heā€™s just saving face.

Transfer spend so far including the loans probably comes somewhere in the region of Ā£6m.

With a Ā£12m (or was it Ā£14m?) shortfall last set of accounts and probably similar last year, thatā€™s a remarkable effort.

More to come.
 
DuffleCoat said:
Daps, quit when you are behind fella. You are now being told by multiple people.

You must be new here. That's par for the course!
 
Transfermrket does have his fee listed as 2million.....

But also has his current value listed as 500k. Which echoes my worries about paying that much out for the guy.

But hopefully that can change.
 
PSumbler said:
One of the things for me that makes a forum - and any form of social media - will be things like the posts of Daps.

He has posted similar for years and will (I am sure) openly admit that some of his statements are quite far from the truth whilst others hit the bullseye.

Most (maybe even himself) take him with a large pinch of salt and I don't buy an argument that it is damaging the club (I still refuse to believe that social media drives decisions of successful businessmen) nor would I support any call for him to be banned. He posts for me within the site guidelines

Didnā€™t take long for the bullying of Daps to start.
 
Honestly people trusting Transfermarkt as fact is a step to far for me. They're on the list of sources not to trust for FM. Always verify elsewhere before using as while there's some sound info on there it's indistinguishable from the pure fiction and guesswork.
 
Itchysphincter said:
Didnā€™t take long for the bullying of Daps to start.

It's fine with me, it's my fault that he has started posting on here so apologies all.
I started posting and then he has jumped on board with his agenda(as stated by others on here) towards me.

Stating Transfermarkt as fact just puts the cherry on this particular thread for me.
The guy could twist tungsten.
 

Norwich City v Swansea City

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
567
Total visitors
653

Forum statistics

Threads
21,033
Messages
287,223
Members
4,727
Back
Top