• Due to a recent spam attack on the site we have switched user registration to require administrator approval. Please bear with us as this could take a few hours to approve new registrations (depending on availability) but all genuine registrations will be approved

Gabrielle Sutton

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cinio Dydd Sul
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 82
  • Views Views: Views 8,927
Risc said:
I just don’t get that daps. What money are you on about? The investment from Cravatt and Morris?

The initial down payment for Whittaker and Martin and his team........what was put to me, it's not like a bank transfer between you and a mate, process takes a few weeks given the amount šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

We have hardly put any money down for Yates, Joseph going the other way was a juggle for that.......so I was told but makes perfect sense.

Put it this way Risc, if Piroe wasn't in his last 12 months then we could easily have seen a summer of player arrivals without anyone leaving for any cash fee.
 
backofthenet said:
stfu Daps - you’re an utter embarrassment to us proper fans, and harmful to the Club with the pretending to be itk made up nonsense you spew. Just f*ck off is it. The Club is watching, fact.

Your behaviour on the matchday thread says everything about the t*at of a troll you truly are, ffs.

Stop, now.

Backoftheclass, always.

I know the club are watching šŸ˜‰
 
DuffleCoat said:
We won’t be, hence why cash flow isn’t a problem.

We can (and usually do) loan money against incoming amortised payments and then pay in instalments, we never have ā€˜to wait for money to hit the account’ - it’s a laughable suggestion, football doesn’t work like that.

The investment hasn’t been reported or listed due to the window and ongoing discussions with other clubs, but it’s certainly materialised.

Yes we did that with the Rodon money. But we haven't for any recent transfers that I'm aware of.

If it hasn't been listed but has materialised, surely the club is going to be well out of compliance by not declaring it by the time the window closes?
 
magicdaps10 said:
The initial down payment for Whittaker and Martin and his team........what was put to me, it's not like a bank transfer between you and a mate, process takes a few weeks given the amount šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

We have hardly put any money down for Yates, Joseph going the other way was a juggle for that.......so I was told but makes perfect sense.

Put it this way Risc, if Piroe wasn't in his last 12 months then we could easily have seen a summer of player arrivals without anyone leaving for any cash fee.

My goodness :roll:

If you knew how much money has been invested into the club (and you will after the window) - you will realise how laughable this is.
 
Chief said:
Yes we did that with the Rodon money. But we haven't for any recent transfers that I'm aware of.

If it hasn't been listed but has materialised, surely the club is going to be well out of compliance by not declaring it by the time the window closes?

We haven’t done it this time because we don’t need to, tells you all you need to know about this silly rumour.

We are well within our rights to not reveal how much money we have available until our transfer dealings are complete.

It will be listed and reported shortly, just as Morris’ investment was.
 
DuffleCoat said:
We haven’t done it this time because we don’t need to, tells you all you need to know about this silly rumour.

We are well within our rights to not reveal how much money we have available until our transfer dealings are complete.

It will be listed and reported shortly, just as Morris’ investment was.

What is the window allowed between receiving investment and declaring it then?

This is money from completely new sources too (whom have been publicly named by the club as directors) so not sure how easy or legal it is to hide that money if indeed it is already in the clubs bank account?

Seems a bit dodgy that we'd be openly spending money that hasn't been declared months before we are going to declare it?
 
DuffleCoat said:
My goodness :roll:

If you knew how much money has been invested into the club (and you will after the window) - you will realise how laughable this is.

Which tallies to the last paragraph in my post that you replied to šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø
 
Chief said:
What is the window allowed between receiving investment and declaring it then?

This is money from completely new sources too (whom have been publicly named by the club as directors) so not sure how easy or legal it is to hide that money if indeed it is already in the clubs bank account?

Seems a bit dodgy that we'd be openly spending money that hasn't been declared months before we are going to declare it?

I couldn’t tell you. But we wouldn’t be doing anything outside of compliance. Nothing is being hidden, it’s being delayed for very good reason.
 
magicdaps10 said:
Which tallies to the last paragraph in my post that you replied to šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

How in any way does what ā€˜tally’ with what you said?

We have a lot of investment into the club, an amount that dwarfs an initial instalment on Russ and his team - hence we haven’t needed to borrow against these petty sums.

What you have said makes no sense and will be confirmed when the listing is made.
 
DuffleCoat said:
I couldn’t tell you. But we wouldn’t be doing anything outside of compliance. Nothing is being hidden, it’s being delayed for very good reason.

Is the theory that we want to appear poorer than we are as we think it'll improve our negotiating position?
 
Chief said:
Is the theory that we want to appear poorer than we are as we think it'll improve our negotiating position?

Not appear poor as such, but not reveal what we have to play with until we have to. It isn’t just clubs we have to negotiate with, it’s agents too.

Since Coventry sold Gyokeres they have been getting stung all over the place. There is a reason they ended up winning the Simms deal, they paid through the nose for him, in all aspects.
 

Swansea City 🦢v Hull City 🐯

Back
Top