• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

I thought I was dreaming the 20mph limit

If someone could be so kind as to translate skippyjacks post I’d be very happy to come back to he/she/they on the points raised however I’m a bit thick so I could do with translation this grammatical masterclass.
 
rockinj said:
If someone could be so kind as to translate skippyjacks post I’d be very happy to come back to he/she/they on the points raised however I’m a bit thick so I could do with translation this grammatical masterclass.

You're making theories up in your own head, it's there in all it's glory, maybe you need a carer even at your age
 
Skippyjack said:
You're making theories up in your own head, it's there in all it's glory, maybe you need a carer even at your age


What theories? What on earth is going on here? :lol:

You mention Royals and billionaires - why?

If I can break it down as I still have no idea what you’re on about.

The only time I mentioned Royals is in relation the BBC when I said they’re quite pro Monarchy. That’s literally it. I mean woooowwwww how controversial what a rebel I am for stating the bleeding obvious.

Billionaires?! Never even mentioned it. I’ve used this awful word “affluent” in relation to some pensioners which is the only thing I can potentially think of and that was basically saying I don’t think rich pensioners should be getting triple lock again wooosh so controversial. Something that is widely debated and much of it in left wing circles. Have I said every pensioner is rich? No of course I haven’t.

What the flip is going on here
 
rockinj said:
What theories? What on earth is going on here? :lol:

You mention Royals and billionaires - why?

If I can break it down as I still have no idea what you’re on about.

The only time I mentioned Royals is in relation the BBC when I said they’re quite pro Monarchy. That’s literally it. I mean woooowwwww how controversial what a rebel I am for stating the bleeding obvious.

Billionaires?! Never even mentioned it. I’ve used this awful word “affluent” in relation to some pensioners which is the only thing I can potentially think of and that was basically saying I don’t think rich pensioners should be getting triple lock again wooosh so controversial. Something that is widely debated and much of it in left wing circles. Have I said every pensioner is rich? No of course I haven’t.

What the flip is going on here

Nothing is going on, you're imagining things in your own head that doesn't exist and posting them down on the forum.. I'm just pointing it out.. I'm also pointing out you talk down to people.. you used a word that billionaires and Royals never use.. yet you pontificate how much superior you are to anybody who comes into contact with you on the forum, and from past posts you were a die hard Tory, in other words you're the gammon who votes for Christmas like a turkey.. and you're definitely in need of some form of help, it's very dementiaesq like..
 
Skippyjack said:
Nothing is going on, you're imagining things in your own head that doesn't exist and posting them down on the forum.. I'm just pointing it out.. I'm also pointing out you talk down to people.. you used a word that billionaires and Royals never use.. yet you pontificate how much superior you are to anybody who comes into contact with you on the forum, and from past posts you were a die hard Tory, in other words you're the gammon who votes for Christmas like a turkey.. and you're definitely in need of some form of help, it's very dementiaesq like..

Wow. Okay.

Slightly offensive but no worries, that’s a very serious illness which is not to be trivialised in that way. I’m not offended but that could offend others just be careful what you say.

I apologise for my use of the word “affluent” it’s obviously got under your skin. I’ll refrain from using big words next time and use more profanity to ‘fit in.’

But seriously my good man don’t mock in that way I have thick skin but that’s not cool. Not cool at all.
 
On the die hard Tory stuff, I never was but I did like to play devils advocate but even if I was what is wrong with changing ones mind on issues? Isn’t that was debate is about? But anyway time to log off for evening.
 
rockinj said:
Wow. Okay.

Slightly offensive but no worries, that’s a very serious illness which is not to be trivialised in that way. I’m not offended but that could offend others just be careful what you say.

I apologise for my use of the word “affluent” it’s obviously got under your skin. I’ll refrain from using big words next time and use more profanity to ‘fit in.’

But seriously my good man don’t mock in that way I have thick skin but that’s not cool. Not cool at all.

I was thinking it might offend, and you're assuming I'm mocking you, I'm merely concerned for your welfare
 
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/26/britain-rich-pensioners-state-pension-age-68-poor

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2020/10/why-wealthy-pensioners-could-be-among-biggest-winners-economic-crisis

Took me 2 secs to google.

Night night
 
Skippyjack said:
I was thinking it might offend, and you're assuming I'm mocking you, I'm merely concerned for your welfare

I’m great thanks mate
 
jack123 said:
Look out rocking, the brains of britain is on the case. :lol: Who I must say, knows ferk all about anyhing.

I actually am :lol: , smarter than Einstein, The Beast, and everyone in Britain, I'm related to nobility, and I'm watched by security services unlike everyone on the forum.. yet I know nothing.. and you'll notice that the people in white overalls won't be knocking on my door to take me away like.. I'm sitting here laughing
 
jack123 said:
Calm down mush.

Angry man isn’t he. The odd part is that he was the one who talked about all this stuff in this thread and I responded. I think he’s projecting.
 

Swansea City v Watford

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
679
Total visitors
758

Forum statistics

Threads
18,913
Messages
264,577
Members
4,699
Back
Top