• Thank you very much | Diolch yn fawr

    All at JackArmy.net would like to thank everyone who has played a part on this site over the past 25 years whether that is through writing, contributing, moderating, posting or just visting and reading.

    Without any of you the work that has gone into the site would have been pointless and we will always be proud that we built, generated and managed a community that was such a big part of the Swansea City supporting life for so long.

    It has been a pleasure to bring to you the site for so long but the time is now right to turn the lights out for the last time but we do it both with a heavy heart and a sense of pride driven by the so many messages received since we announced the closure.

    The site will remain here for a period until we archive and mothball it for the last time later this summer but all aspects are in a read only format.

    Thank you though for all the memories

    Phil Sumbler
    Owner, jackarmy.net

Kevin Johns

  • Thread starter Thread starter PSumbler
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies: Replies 46
  • Views Views: Views 11,586
I find it astonishing the lead investigator didn’t watch the full police interview which was only 92 minutes long.

What follows is an excerpt from Wales Online:

Defence barrister claims 'fundamental failings permeated the investigation'

Mr Roberts says there were “failings” in the police investigation into the allegations from the very beginning with the officer who questioned Johns after his arrest not even having watched the full interview with the alleged victim.

The barrister tells the jury that after they watched the complainant’s videoed interview at the start of the trial “you knew more about the case than the officer did when he interviewed the defendant”. He says the full video was only 92 minutes long yet the officer did not watch it. He says that is a “disservice to the prosecution and a disservice to the defence”.

He says “fundamental failings permeated the investigation” and the police probe only went in one direction and there was never any attempt to find or consider other evidence.
 
What was the score amongst the jury in the end, was it a unanimous decision or a majority decision ?
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top