With bels on. The again, I'd take anyone at this rateCarrick anyone?
Most visitors online was 4328 , on 11 Aug 25
With bels on. The again, I'd take anyone at this rateCarrick anyone?
Time to share them with the rest of usTime to leave the drugs alone . . .
Your deludedWe can still get a draw here
Investing heavily in a squad means nothing if you buy mostly shite. The only two good players we have signed are Burgess and Galbraith. And one of them was free. The rest are, at best, underwhelming, at worst, cack.We've invested heavily in our squad which should equate to improvements on the pitch, but it isn't equating to that. Individual errors are not my point, the whole squad performance is. It's like a broken record watching them game after game.
I still feel like it’s hard to judge. Burgess and Galbraith have been decent in my eyes. Feels like we’ve hardly seen Inoussa and Yalcouye. Stamenic has been in and out for different reasons. Considering how bad our underlying numbers are, the fact that we’re up and down results wise probably means there’s a decent baseline of quality there.Our squad is better than these performances but it also might not be as good as we thought. By the week our window looks not quite as exciting as we first hoped in August.
It's a good chance that it will be another loss on Saturday.Dare I say this. If it means Sheehan goes ill take the loss tonight and Saturday. How sick is that.![]()
His decisions are generally poor. That’s what should and probably will do for him. There’s no learning happening.Cullen has been shit and Widell gets hooked
And, your protestation is admirable but you're talking toshInvesting heavily in a squad means nothing if you buy mostly shite. The only two good players we have signed are Burgess and Galbraith. And one of them was free. The rest are, at best, underwhelming, at worst, cack.
We could sack Sheehan tomorrow, we'd probably get a little bounce, but most of this lot would very quickly just go back to being rubbish. More than enough evidence by now for several of them