• ***IMPORTANT*** SOME PASSWORDS NOT WORKING

    There has been some issues with user passwords. Some users may need to reset their passwords to login to the forum. Please use the password reset option when logging in. If you do experience issues and find our account is locked then please email admin@jackarmy.net Thanks

The Glammy 2022 thread

So Glamorgan drop David Lloyd for the Leicestershire game and his replacement, Tom Bevan cracks a blistering ton, so what do they do next, Drop the in form Bevan and bring back the hapless Lloyd for the Worcestershire match...

DL Lloyd c Haynes b Gibbon 4

It's the Glamorgan way see :lol:
 
Swanjaxs said:
So Glamorgan drop David Lloyd for the Leicestershire game and his replacement, Tom Bevan cracks a blistering ton, so what do they do next, Drop the in form Bevan and bring back the hapless Lloyd for the Worcestershire match...

DL Lloyd c Haynes b Gibbon 4

It's the Glamorgan way see :lol:

I see Lloyd is listed as a middle-order batsman, so it does seem strange that Glamorgan keep picking him as an opener. As you say, why not give Bevan more experience?
 
JackSomething said:
Swanjaxs said:
So Glamorgan drop David Lloyd for the Leicestershire game and his replacement, Tom Bevan cracks a blistering ton, so what do they do next, Drop the in form Bevan and bring back the hapless Lloyd for the Worcestershire match...

DL Lloyd c Haynes b Gibbon 4

It's the Glamorgan way see :lol:

I see Lloyd is listed as a middle-order batsman, so it does seem strange that Glamorgan keep picking him as an opener. As you say, why not give Bevan more experience?

Spot on! Even more bizarre is Lloyd opening the batting today ahead of India opening Test batsman Shubman Gill, who came in after his dismissal :lol:
 
Swanjaxs said:
JackSomething said:
I see Lloyd is listed as a middle-order batsman, so it does seem strange that Glamorgan keep picking him as an opener. As you say, why not give Bevan more experience?

Spot on! Even more bizarre is Lloyd opening the batting today ahead of India opening Test batsman Shubman Gill, who came in after his dismissal :lol:

Fvcking incredible thinking in such an important match.

Exactly the same with Durham away.

Needing 196 runs to win, Maynard decides to open with a No 9 and No 10 batsmen - Salter and Gorvin. ( Lloyd was injured)

Durham hadn't taken 20 wickets in a match until they played us. Tremendous bowling from Potts, but we certainly didn't help in persisting in using Salter as an opening bat, and then promoting Gorvin up the batting order.

Gorvin had been batting No 9/10 for the 2nd X1.
 
TheLoneRanger said:
Swanjaxs said:
Spot on! Even more bizarre is Lloyd opening the batting today ahead of India opening Test batsman Shubman Gill, who came in after his dismissal :lol:

Fvcking incredible thinking in such an important match.

Exactly the same with Durham away.

Needing 196 runs to win, Maynard decides to open with a No 9 and No 10 batsmen - Salter and Gorvin. ( Lloyd was injured)

Durham hadn't taken 20 wickets in a match until they played us. Tremendous bowling from Potts, but we certainly didn't help in persisting in using Salter as an opening bat, and then promoting Gorvin up the batting order.

Gorvin had been batting No 9/10 for the 2nd X1.

It's shocking really, it seems Glamorgan are determined to push players, even when hopelessly out of form, or even just not good enough, just because they are Welsh...
 
The massive news is that as said earlier Labuschagne has signed for another 2 years.
 
dickythorpe said:
The massive news is that as said earlier Labuschagne has signed for another 2 years.

It's like owning a Lamborghini on a beans on toast lifestyle, our batting looks rosey, our bowling less so...
 

Coventry City v Swansea City

Online statistics

Members online
17
Guests online
657
Total visitors
674

Forum statistics

Threads
17,891
Messages
256,197
Members
4,689
Back
Top